Dausey David J, Buehler James W, Lurie Nicole
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 29;7:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-92.
Since 2001, state and local health departments in the United States (US) have accelerated efforts to prepare for high-impact public health emergencies. One component of these activities has been the development and conduct of exercise programs to assess capabilities, train staff and build relationships. This paper summarizes lessons learned from tabletop exercises about public health emergency preparedness and about the process of developing, conducting, and evaluating them.
We developed, conducted, and evaluated 31 tabletop exercises in partnership with state and local health departments throughout the US from 2003 to 2006. Participant self evaluations, after action reports, and tabletop exercise evaluation forms were used to identify aspects of the exercises themselves, as well as public health emergency responses that participants found more or less challenging, and to highlight lessons learned about tabletop exercise design.
Designing the exercises involved substantial collaboration with representatives from participating health departments to assure that the scenarios were credible, focused attention on local preparedness needs and priorities, and were logistically feasible to implement. During execution of the exercises, nearly all health departments struggled with a common set of challenges relating to disease surveillance, epidemiologic investigations, communications, command and control, and health care surge capacity. In contrast, performance strengths were more varied across participating sites, reflecting specific attributes of individual health departments or communities, experience with actual public health emergencies, or the emphasis of prior preparedness efforts.
The design, conduct, and evaluation of the tabletop exercises described in this report benefited from collaborative planning that involved stakeholders from participating health departments and exercise developers and facilitators from outside the participating agencies. While these exercises identified both strengths and vulnerabilities in emergency preparedness, additional work is needed to develop reliable metrics to gauge exercise performance, inform follow-up action steps, and to develop re-evaluation exercise designs that assess the impact of post-exercise interventions.
自2001年以来,美国州和地方卫生部门加快了为应对高影响公共卫生紧急事件做准备的工作。这些活动的一个组成部分是制定和开展演练计划,以评估能力、培训工作人员并建立关系。本文总结了从桌面演练中汲取的有关公共卫生应急准备以及演练开发、实施和评估过程的经验教训。
2003年至2006年期间,我们与美国各地的州和地方卫生部门合作,开发、实施并评估了31次桌面演练。通过参与者自我评价、行动后报告和桌面演练评估表,来确定演练本身的各个方面,以及参与者认为更具挑战性或挑战性较小的公共卫生应急响应,并突出有关桌面演练设计的经验教训。
设计演练需要与参与的卫生部门代表进行大量合作,以确保情景可信,将注意力集中在当地的准备需求和优先事项上,并且在后勤上可行。在演练执行过程中,几乎所有卫生部门都在与一系列与疾病监测、流行病学调查、通信、指挥与控制以及医疗保健应急能力相关的常见挑战作斗争。相比之下,各参与地点的表现优势则更为多样,反映了各个卫生部门或社区的特定属性、应对实际公共卫生紧急事件的经验,或先前准备工作的重点。
本报告中描述的桌面演练的设计、实施和评估受益于合作规划,该规划涉及参与的卫生部门的利益相关者以及参与机构外部的演练开发者和协调者。虽然这些演练确定了应急准备中的优势和弱点,但仍需要开展更多工作,以制定可靠的指标来衡量演练表现、为后续行动步骤提供信息,并开发重新评估演练设计,以评估演练后干预措施的影响。