Destura Raul V, Lam Hilton Y, Navarro Rohani C, Lopez Jaifred Christian F, Sales Reneepearl Kim P, Gomez Ma Ida Faye A, Dela Tonga Angelo, Ulanday Gianne Eduard
National Training Center for Biosafety and Biosecurity, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines-Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Institute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines-Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Appl Biosaf. 2021 Dec 1;26(4):232-244. doi: 10.1089/apb.20.0070. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
The emergence of biological threats that can potentially affect millions emphasizes the need to develop a policy framework in the Philippines that can mount an adequate and well-coordinated response. The objective of the study was to assess, strengthen, and harmonize efforts in biorisk management through the development of a National Biorisk Management Framework. The development of the National Biorisk Management Framework was carried out in two phases: (1) assessment of the current biosafety and biosecurity landscape and (2) framework development. This study identified policy gaps in the incorporation of biosafety in course curricula, professional development, and organizational twinning. The desired policy outcomes focus on increasing the capacity and quality of facilities, and the development of the biosafety officer profession. The tabletop exercises revealed weak implementation of existing protocols and unclear coordination mechanisms for emergency response. Based on these, a framework was drafted composed of eight key areas in biosafety and biosecurity, and four key contexts in risk reduction and management. Reforms in biosafety and biosecurity policies are expected to improve coordination, ensure sustainability, capacitate facilities, and professionalize biosafety officers. Because of the complexity of reforms necessary, success will require a consistent and coherent policy framework that (1) provides well-coordinated mechanisms toward harmonized risk reduction and management, (2) establishes and enforces guidelines on biosafety, biosecurity, and biorisk management, (3) regulates facilities essential for occupational safety and public health, and (4) is financed by the General Appropriations Act as part of the national budget.
可能影响数百万人的生物威胁的出现,凸显了在菲律宾制定一个能够做出充分且协调良好的应对措施的政策框架的必要性。本研究的目的是通过制定国家生物风险管理框架来评估、加强和协调生物风险管理方面的工作。国家生物风险管理框架的制定分两个阶段进行:(1)评估当前的生物安全和生物安保状况;(2)制定框架。本研究确定了在课程设置、专业发展和组织结对中纳入生物安全方面的政策差距。期望的政策成果侧重于提高设施的能力和质量,以及发展生物安全官员职业。桌面演练揭示了现有协议执行不力以及应急响应协调机制不明确的问题。基于这些,起草了一个框架,该框架由生物安全和生物安保的八个关键领域以及风险降低和管理的四个关键背景组成。生物安全和生物安保政策改革有望改善协调、确保可持续性、提升设施能力并使生物安全官员专业化。由于所需改革的复杂性,成功将需要一个一致且连贯的政策框架,该框架要(1)提供协调良好的机制以实现统一的风险降低和管理;(2)制定并执行生物安全、生物安保和生物风险管理指南;(3)对职业安全和公共卫生至关重要的设施进行监管;(4)由作为国家预算一部分的《一般拨款法》提供资金。