• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对群体间伤害感到集体责任会导致人性贬低吗?

Does feeling collective responsibility for intergroup harm lead to infrahumanization?

作者信息

Brennan Robert A, Enock Florence E, Bunce Carl J, Over Harriet

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

The Institute of Future Media, Democracy and Society, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323292. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323292
PMID:40440341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12121804/
Abstract

Previous research has suggested that subtle dehumanization can occur as a consequence of harming others. According to this research, participants who feel a sense of collective responsibility for their ingroup contributing to the harm experienced by an outgroup may perceive members of that group as experiencing uniquely human emotions to a lesser extent, compared to when they do not feel responsible. We sought to understand whether these results replicate in two novel intergroup contexts: understanding UK residents' perceptions of those who disproportionately experience the harmful effects of climate change in Nigeria, and employees working in exploitative conditions in fast fashion supply chains. Across three well-powered and pre-registered studies, we successfully manipulated perceived harm against the target groups and perceived ingroup responsibility for that harm. However, we found no evidence for the previously reported relationship between one's sense of collective responsibility for harm and the perceived extent that target outgroup members experience uniquely human emotions. Instead, a more straightforward pattern was found in all three studies, whereby participants perceived outgroup members to experience negative emotions to a greater extent when harm towards them has been made salient. This trend was irrespective of whether the emotions were uniquely human (e.g., admiration, shame) or shared with other animals (e.g., joy, sadness). The often evoked relationship between the need to justify harm and the tendency to subtly dehumanize harmed outgroup members may be less common than is often assumed.

摘要

先前的研究表明,伤害他人可能会导致微妙的去人性化现象。根据这项研究,那些因本群体对另一群体所遭受的伤害负有集体责任感的参与者,相较于他们没有责任感时,可能会认为该群体成员在较小程度上体验到独特的人类情感。我们试图了解这些结果是否会在两种新的群体间情境中得到重现:一是了解英国居民对尼日利亚那些 disproportionately 承受气候变化有害影响的人群的看法,二是了解在快时尚供应链中处于剥削性工作条件下的员工的情况。在三项有充分效力且预先注册的研究中,我们成功操纵了对目标群体的感知伤害以及对该伤害的群体内责任感。然而,我们没有发现证据支持先前报道的对伤害的集体责任感与目标外群体成员被感知到体验独特人类情感的程度之间的关系。相反,在所有三项研究中都发现了一种更直接的模式,即当对外部群体成员的伤害变得显著时,参与者会认为他们在更大程度上体验到负面情绪。这种趋势与这些情绪是独特的人类情绪(如钦佩、羞耻)还是与其他动物共有的情绪(如喜悦、悲伤)无关。为伤害行为进行辩护的需求与对受伤害的外部群体成员进行微妙去人性化的倾向之间经常被提及的关系,可能并不像通常所认为的那么普遍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/38f6780d2654/pone.0323292.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/f382b669dd4c/pone.0323292.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/715afbd9e572/pone.0323292.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/354e3ce8081c/pone.0323292.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/0d9b17c52a0a/pone.0323292.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/77107fd9be2c/pone.0323292.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/38f6780d2654/pone.0323292.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/f382b669dd4c/pone.0323292.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/715afbd9e572/pone.0323292.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/354e3ce8081c/pone.0323292.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/0d9b17c52a0a/pone.0323292.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/77107fd9be2c/pone.0323292.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b64/12121804/38f6780d2654/pone.0323292.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Does feeling collective responsibility for intergroup harm lead to infrahumanization?对群体间伤害感到集体责任会导致人性贬低吗?
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323292. eCollection 2025.
2
Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution.群体间偏好而非去人性化解释了情感归因中的社会偏见。
Cognition. 2021 Nov;216:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104865. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
3
Not quite human: infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing.并非完全是人:应对群体间杀戮的集体责任时的次等人化现象
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):804-18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804.
4
From humanitarian aid to humanization: When outgroup, but not ingroup, helping increases humanization.从人道主义援助到人化:当帮助的是外群体,而不是内群体时,会增加人的化。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207343. eCollection 2018.
5
Reduced helping intentions are better explained by the attribution of antisocial emotions than by 'infrahumanization'.减少帮助意愿可以更好地归因于反社会情绪,而不是“去人性化”。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10460-0.
6
No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization.没有令人信服的证据表明外群体被剥夺了独特的人类特征:区分基于特质的去人性化与群体间偏好。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104682. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104682. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.他们将我们视为低人一等:元非人化通过相互非人化预测群体间冲突。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;110(3):343-70. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000044.
8
Do they feel the same as us? The infrahumanization of individuals with Down syndrome.他们的感受和我们一样吗?唐氏综合征患者的次等人化现象。
Psicothema. 2016 Aug;28(3):311-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.10.
9
Perceiving mixed valence emotions reduces intergroup dehumanisation.感知混合效价情绪可减少群体间的非人化现象。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):1018-1031. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1383885. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Meta-humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross-group interaction.元人类化增强了对亲社会跨群体互动的积极反应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul;60(3):1051-1074. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12435. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
To what extent is research on infrahumanization confounded by intergroup preference?对非人类化的研究在多大程度上受到群体间偏好的混淆?
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 16;12(4):241348. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241348. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Attribution of undesirable character traits, rather than trait-based dehumanization, predicts punishment decisions.不良性格特征的归因,而非基于特质的非人化,预测惩罚决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):240087. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240087. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Animalistic slurs increase harm by changing perceptions of social desirability.
带有兽性的诋毁性言语通过改变社会合意性认知来增加伤害。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 12;10(7):230203. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230203. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Dehumanization after all: Distinguishing intergroup evalutation from trait-based dehumanization.终究还是去人性化:区分群体间评价与基于特质的去人性化。
Cognition. 2023 Feb;231:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105329. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
If everything is dehumanization, then nothing is.如果一切都是非人性化,那么就没有什么是非人性化了。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;26(7):539. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
Reduced helping intentions are better explained by the attribution of antisocial emotions than by 'infrahumanization'.减少帮助意愿可以更好地归因于反社会情绪,而不是“去人性化”。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10460-0.
7
Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution.群体间偏好而非去人性化解释了情感归因中的社会偏见。
Cognition. 2021 Nov;216:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104865. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization.没有令人信服的证据表明外群体被剥夺了独特的人类特征:区分基于特质的去人性化与群体间偏好。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104682. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104682. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Falsifying the Dehumanization Hypothesis.证伪去人性化假说。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):33-38. doi: 10.1177/1745691620969657. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
10
Seven Clarifications on the Psychology of Dehumanization.关于去人性化心理的七点阐释
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):28-32. doi: 10.1177/1745691620953767. Epub 2020 Nov 20.