Suppr超能文献

打结还是不打结?与外科结相比的无缝合止血法。

To knot or not to knot? Sutureless haemostasis compared to the surgeon's knot.

作者信息

Rajbabu K, Barber N J, Choi W, Muir G H

机构信息

Department of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):359-62. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183418.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to carry out an independent evaluation of the efficacy and security of a number of vessel ligation devices and ligatures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A vascular ligation model was devised using fresh, ex vivo porcine internal carotid arteries of varying external diameters. Coloured normal saline was infused via a pressure/monitor device through the artery. The end lumen was occluded by five different techniques: (i) braided suture in a surgeon's knot; (ii) a monofilament suture in a granny knot; (iii) a metallic clip (Ligaclip, Johnson and Johnson); (iv) a bipolar diathermy system (Ligasure, ValleyLab); and (v) an ultrasonically activated scalpel (Harmonic Scalpel, Johnson and Johnson). The vessels were subjected to supraphysiological pressures. Loss of haemostasis was evident by leakage of coloured perfusion fluid.

RESULTS

Secure haemostasis was obtained with all the techniques in all vessels below 5 mm in diameter. In vessels over 5 mm, secure haemostasis was obtained with all modalities except harmonic scalpel. With the harmonic scalpel, leaks occurred in 3/27 (11%) vessels between 5-6 mm and 3/5 (60%) vessels over 6 mm, confirming the manufacturer's instructions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first, independent, randomised study comparing vessel ligation devices and ligatures, the manufacturer's claims for each of the haemostatic methods were accurate. We find that all the modalities tested perform as well as the traditional surgeon's knot in vessels of 5 mm and below.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在对多种血管结扎器械和结扎线的有效性和安全性进行独立评估。

材料与方法

使用不同外径的新鲜离体猪颈内动脉设计了一种血管结扎模型。通过压力/监测装置经动脉注入有色生理盐水。采用五种不同技术闭塞血管内腔:(i)外科结中的编织缝线;(ii)奶奶结中的单丝缝线;(iii)金属夹(强生公司的 Ligaclip);(iv)双极电凝系统(ValleyLab 公司的 Ligasure);(v)超声刀(强生公司的 Harmonic Scalpel)。使血管承受超生理压力。有色灌注液渗漏表明止血失败。

结果

在所有直径小于 5 毫米的血管中,所有技术均实现了可靠止血。在直径大于 5 毫米的血管中,除超声刀外,所有方式均实现了可靠止血。使用超声刀时,5 - 6 毫米之间的血管中有 3/27(11%)发生渗漏,大于 6 毫米的血管中有 3/5(60%)发生渗漏,证实了制造商的说明。

结论

在这项首次比较血管结扎器械和结扎线的独立随机研究中,每种止血方法的制造商声明都是准确的。我们发现,在直径 5 毫米及以下的血管中,所有测试方式的效果与传统外科结相同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Examination of resistance of various methods of pulmonary vessel occlusion to hydrostatic pressure.各种肺血管闭塞方法对静水压力的抗性检测。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;39(5):484-488. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01505-8. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
3
Vessel sealing comparison: old school is still hip.血管封闭比较:传统方法仍然很流行。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4653-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4778-0. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Thyroidectomy with LigaSure.甲状腺切除术联合 LigaSure 技术。
Surg Today. 2011 Jun;41(6):767-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4364-3. Epub 2011 May 28.

本文引用的文献

3
Extravasal occlusion of large vessels with titanic clips: efficiency, indications, and contraindications.
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2002 Nov;134(5):516-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1022671220993.
7
Safety evaluation of laparoscopically applied clips.
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996 Apr;6(2):99-107. doi: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.99.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验