Wonderlich Stephen A, Crosby Ross D, Engel Scott G, Mitchell James E, Smyth Joshua, Miltenberger Raymond
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 1919 Elm Street North, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Jun;21(3):340-57. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.3.340.
The present study examined whether personality-based subgroups of bulimic individuals differed in eating disorder behavior, comorbid psychopathology, treatment history, and momentary assessments of mood and behavior. Participants completed an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) protocol for a period of 2 weeks. Latent profile analysis on the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology revealed 3 groupings of bulimic participants: Interpersonal-emotional, Stimulus seeking-hostile, and Low personality pathology. The personality-based groups differed in histories of mood, anxiety, substance use disorders, features of borderline personality disorder, treatment history, and several momentary measures. These findings suggest that personality variation within the bulimia nervosa diagnostic construct may be associated with meaningful conceptual and clinical differences, including daily experiences in the natural environment.
本研究考察了贪食症患者基于人格的亚组在饮食失调行为、共病精神病理学、治疗史以及情绪和行为的即时评估方面是否存在差异。参与者完成为期2周的生态即时评估(EMA)方案。对人格病理学维度评估进行潜在剖面分析,发现贪食症参与者有3种分组:人际情感型、寻求刺激-敌对型和低人格病理学型。基于人格的这些组在情绪、焦虑、物质使用障碍病史、边缘性人格障碍特征、治疗史以及几项即时测量方面存在差异。这些发现表明,神经性贪食症诊断结构中的人格差异可能与有意义的概念和临床差异相关,包括自然环境中的日常经历。