Suppr超能文献

基层医疗服务提供者对于与协作支持团队合作的偏好。

Primary care provider preferences for working with a collaborative support team.

作者信息

Dobscha Steven K, Leibowitz Ruth Q, Flores Jennifer A, Doak Melanie, Gerrity Martha S

机构信息

Columbia Center for the Study of Chronic, Comorbid Mental and Physical Disorders, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2007 May 30;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical interventions based on collaborative models require effective communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and collaborative support teams. Despite growing interest in collaborative care, we have identified no published studies describing how PCPs prefer to communicate and interact with collaborative support teams. This manuscript examines the communication and interaction preferences of PCPs participating in an ongoing randomized clinical trial of a collaborative intervention for chronic pain and depression.

METHODS

The trial is being conducted in five primary care clinics of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Twenty-one PCPs randomized to the study intervention completed a survey regarding preferences for interacting with the collaborative support team.

RESULTS

A majority of PCPs identified email (95%) and telephone calls (68%) as preferred modes for communicating with members of the support team. In contrast, only 29% identified in-person communications as preferred. Most PCPs preferred that the care manager and physician pain specialist assess patients (76%) and make initial treatment changes (71%) without first conferring with the PCP. One-half wanted to be designated cosigners of all support team notes in the electronic medical record, one-half wanted to receive brief and focused information rather than in-depth information about their patients, and one-half wanted their practice nurses automatically included in communications. Panel size was strongly associated (p < 0.001) with preference for brief, to-the-point discussions about patients.

CONCLUSION

The substantial variation in PCP communication preferences suggests the need for knowledge of these preferences when designing and implementing collaborative interventions. Additional research is needed to understand relationships between clinician and practice characteristics and interaction preferences.

摘要

背景

基于协作模式的临床干预需要初级保健提供者(PCP)与协作支持团队之间进行有效的沟通。尽管人们对协作护理的兴趣日益浓厚,但我们尚未发现有已发表的研究描述PCP更喜欢如何与协作支持团队进行沟通和互动。本文探讨了参与一项正在进行的针对慢性疼痛和抑郁症的协作干预随机临床试验的PCP的沟通和互动偏好。

方法

该试验在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心的五个初级保健诊所进行。随机分配到研究干预组的21名PCP完成了一项关于与协作支持团队互动偏好的调查。

结果

大多数PCP将电子邮件(95%)和电话(68%)确定为与支持团队成员沟通的首选方式。相比之下,只有29%的人将面对面沟通确定为首选。大多数PCP希望护理经理和疼痛专科医生在不首先与PCP协商的情况下评估患者(76%)并进行初始治疗调整(71%)。一半的人希望被指定为电子病历中所有支持团队记录的共同签署人,一半的人希望收到简短而重点突出的信息而非关于其患者的详细信息,还有一半的人希望其执业护士自动纳入沟通范围。小组规模与对关于患者的简短、切中要害的讨论的偏好密切相关(p<0.001)。

结论

PCP沟通偏好的显著差异表明,在设计和实施协作干预时需要了解这些偏好。需要进一步的研究来理解临床医生和实践特征与互动偏好之间的关系。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Motivation to change chronic illness care: results from a national evaluation of quality improvement collaboratives.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2005 Apr-Jun;30(2):139-56. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200504000-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验