Herrmann Richard, Bodoky György, Ruhstaller Thomas, Glimelius Bengt, Bajetta Emilio, Schüller Johannes, Saletti Piercarlo, Bauer Jean, Figer Arie, Pestalozzi Bernhard, Köhne Claus-Henning, Mingrone Walter, Stemmer Salomon M, Tàmas Karin, Kornek Gabriela V, Koeberle Dieter, Cina Susanne, Bernhard Jürg, Dietrich Daniel, Scheithauer Werner
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 1;25(16):2212-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0886.
This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent.
A total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms.
GemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.
本III期试验比较了吉西他滨(Gem)联合卡培他滨(GemCap)与单药吉西他滨治疗晚期/转移性胰腺癌的疗效和安全性。
患者被随机分配接受GemCap(口服卡培他滨650mg/m²,每日2次,第1至14天用药,联合吉西他滨1000mg/m²,每3周第1天和第8天静脉滴注30分钟)或吉西他滨(1000mg/m²静脉滴注30分钟,每周1次,共7周,随后休息1周,然后每4周每周用药3周)。患者根据中心、卡氏评分(KPS)、疼痛情况和疾病范围进行分层。
2001年6月至2004年6月共入组319例患者。主要终点指标总生存(OS)时间的中位数在GemCap组和吉西他滨组分别为8.4个月和7.2个月(P = 0.234)。对KPS良好(评分90至100)的患者进行事后分析显示,与吉西他滨组相比,GemCap组的OS时间中位数显著延长(分别为10.1个月和7.4个月;P = 0.014)。每组3/4级不良事件的总发生率相似。中性粒细胞减少是两组中最常见的3/4级不良事件。
与标准吉西他滨治疗相比,GemCap未能在统计学显著水平上改善OS。GemCap和吉西他滨的安全性相似。在体能状态良好的患者亚组中,OS中位数显著改善。GemCap是一种可行的方案,可考虑作为单药吉西他滨的替代方案,用于治疗体能状态良好的晚期/转移性胰腺癌患者。