Williams Elizabeth A
Department of History, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3054, USA.
Isis. 2007 Mar;98(1):54-79. doi: 10.1086/512831.
In the period 1800-1870, French physicians approached psychic illness (Philippe Pinel's "neurosis") within competing "cerebralist" and "visceralist" frameworks. Cerebralism, which dominated the specialty of mental medicine, sought the origins of psychic illness in lesions of the brain and central nervous system. "Visceralism," upheld by generalists, clung to the view of the ancients that psychic disorder was seated in the abdominal viscera. The distinction enjoyed credibility thanks to widespread acceptance of Xavier Bichat's "two lives" doctrine, which demarcated functions of the central and the "vegetative" nervous systems. Once the "two lives" conception was undercut after midcentury, cerebralists sought to draw disturbances of appetite, digestion, and eating within the domain of the central nervous system. This essay suggests that historical study of "hysterical anorexia" and related disease entities that displaced "neuroses of the stomach" has overemphasized sociocultural determinants to the neglect of the internal dynamics of biomedical science.
在1800年至1870年期间,法国医生在相互竞争的“大脑主义”和“内脏主义”框架内探讨精神疾病(菲利普·皮内尔的“神经症”)。主导精神医学专业的大脑主义,在大脑和中枢神经系统的病变中寻找精神疾病的根源。由通科医生支持的“内脏主义”,坚持古人的观点,即精神障碍位于腹部内脏。由于广泛接受了 Xavier Bichat 的“两种生命”学说,这种区分具有可信度,该学说划分了中枢神经系统和“植物性”神经系统的功能。一旦“两种生命”的概念在世纪中叶之后受到削弱,大脑主义者就试图将食欲、消化和饮食紊乱纳入中枢神经系统的范畴。本文认为,对“癔症性厌食症”以及取代“胃神经症”的相关疾病实体的历史研究,过度强调了社会文化决定因素,而忽视了生物医学科学的内部动态。