Suppr超能文献

对含氰化金尾矿溶液对野生动物影响的批判性综述。

A critical review of the effects of gold cyanide-bearing tailings solutions on wildlife.

作者信息

Donato D B, Nichols O, Possingham H, Moore M, Ricci P F, Noller B N

机构信息

National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (EnTox), University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road Coopers Plains 4108, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2007 Oct;33(7):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 30.

Abstract

Wildlife deaths associated with cyanide-bearing mine waste solutions have plagued the gold mining industries for many years, yet there is little published data showing the relationship between wildlife mortality and cyanide toxicity. A gap of knowledge exists in monitoring, understanding the causal relationships and managing risks to wildlife from cyanide-bearing waste solutions and tailings. There is a need for the gold industry to address this issue and to meet the International Cyanide Management Code (ICMC) guidelines. The perceived extent of the issue varies, with one study finding the issue inadequately monitored and wildlife deaths grossly underestimated. In Nevada, USA during 1990 and 1991, 9512 carcasses were reported of over 100 species, although there was underestimation due to reporting being voluntary. Of these, birds comprised 80-91% of vertebrate carcasses reported annually. At Northparkes, Australia in 1995, it was initially estimated that 100 bird carcasses were present by mine staff following a tailings incident; when a thorough count was conducted, 1583 bird carcasses were recorded. Eventually, 2700 bird deaths were documented over a four-month period. It is identified that avian deaths are usually undetected and significantly underestimated, leading to a perception that a risk does not exist. Few guidelines and information are available to manage the risks of cyanide to wildlife, although detoxification, habitat modification and denying wildlife access have been used effectively. Hazing techniques have proven ineffective. Apparently no literature exists that documents accurate wildlife monitoring protocols on potentially toxic cyanide-bearing mine waste solutions or any understanding on the analysis of any derived dataset. This places the onus on mining operations to document that no risk to wildlife exists. Cyanide-bearing tailings storage facilities are environmental control structures to contain tailings, a standard practice in the mining industry. Cyanide concentrations below 50 mg/L weak-acid-dissociable (WAD) are deemed safe to wildlife but are considered an interim benchmark for discharge into tailings storage facilities (TSFs). Cyanide is a fast acting poison, and its toxicity is related to the types of cyanide complexes that are present. Cyanide in biota binds to iron, copper and sulfur-containing enzymes and proteins required for oxygen transportation to cells. The accurate determination of cyanide concentrations in the field is difficult to achieve due to sampling techniques and analytical error associated with loss and interferences following collection. The main WAD cyanide complexes in gold mine tailings are stable in the TSF environment but can release cyanide ions under varying environmental conditions including ingestion and absorption by wildlife. Therefore distinction between free, WAD and total cyanide forms in tailings water for regulatory purposes is justified. From an environmental perspective, there is a distinction between ore bodies on the basis of their copper content. For example, wildlife deaths are more likely to occur at mines possessing copper-gold ores due to the formation of copper-cyanide complexes which is toxic to birds and bats. The formation of copper-cyanide complex occurs preferentially to gold cyanide complex indicating the relative importance of economic vs. environmental considerations in the tailings water. Management of cyanide to a perceived threshold has inherent risks since cyanide has a steep toxicity response curve; is difficult to accurately measure in the field; and is likely to vary due to variable copper content of ore bodies and ore blending. Consequently, wildlife interaction needs to be limited to further reduce the risks. A gap in knowledge exists to design or manage cyanide-bearing mine waste solutions to render such facilities unattractive to at-risk wildlife species. This gap may be overcome by understanding the wildlife behaviour and habitat usage of cyanide-bearing solutions.

摘要

与含氰化物的矿山废水相关的野生动物死亡问题多年来一直困扰着黄金采矿业,但几乎没有公开数据表明野生动物死亡率与氰化物毒性之间的关系。在监测、理解因果关系以及管理含氰化物废水和尾矿对野生动物的风险方面,存在知识空白。黄金行业有必要解决这个问题并符合《国际氰化物管理规范》(ICMC)的指导方针。对该问题的认知程度各不相同,一项研究发现该问题监测不足,野生动物死亡数量被严重低估。在美国内华达州,1990年至1991年期间,报告了超过100个物种的9512具尸体,不过由于报告是自愿的,存在低估情况。其中,鸟类占每年报告的脊椎动物尸体的80 - 91%。1995年在澳大利亚的北帕克斯,最初矿山工作人员估计尾矿事故后有100具鸟类尸体;进行彻底清点后,记录到1583具鸟类尸体。最终,在四个月的时间里记录了2700只鸟类死亡。据确认,鸟类死亡通常未被发现且被严重低估,导致人们认为不存在风险。虽然已有效采用解毒、栖息地改造和阻止野生动物进入等方法,但用于管理氰化物对野生动物风险的指导方针和信息很少。驱赶技术已证明无效。显然,没有文献记录关于对潜在有毒的含氰化物矿山废水进行准确野生动物监测的方案,也没有对任何衍生数据集进行分析的相关理解。这使得采矿作业有责任证明对野生动物不存在风险。含氰化物的尾矿储存设施是用于容纳尾矿的环境控制结构,这是采矿业的标准做法。低于50毫克/升弱酸可解离(WAD)的氰化物浓度被认为对野生动物是安全的,但这被视为排放到尾矿储存设施(TSF)的临时基准。氰化物是一种作用迅速的毒药,其毒性与存在的氰化物络合物类型有关。生物群中的氰化物与氧气输送到细胞所需的含铁、铜和含硫的酶及蛋白质结合。由于采样技术以及与采集后损失和干扰相关的分析误差,很难在现场准确测定氰化物浓度。金矿尾矿中主要的WAD氰化物络合物在TSF环境中是稳定的,但在包括野生动物摄入和吸收等不同环境条件下会释放氰化物离子。因此,出于监管目的区分尾矿水中游离、WAD和总氰化物形式是合理的。从环境角度看,矿体根据其铜含量存在差异。例如,由于形成对鸟类和蝙蝠有毒的铜 - 氰化物络合物,在拥有铜金矿的矿山更有可能发生野生动物死亡。铜 - 氰化物络合物的形成优先于金氰化物络合物,这表明在尾矿水中经济因素与环境因素的相对重要性。将氰化物管理到可感知的阈值存在固有风险,因为氰化物具有陡峭的毒性响应曲线;在现场难以准确测量;并且可能因矿体铜含量变化和矿石混合而有所不同。因此,需要限制野生动物的接触以进一步降低风险。在设计或管理含氰化物的矿山废水以使此类设施对濒危野生动物物种缺乏吸引力方面存在知识空白。通过了解含氰化物溶液的野生动物行为和栖息地使用情况,可能会克服这一空白。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验