Stocchetti N, Barbagallo M, Gordon C R, Mensi F, Paparella A, Piazza P, Serioli T
I Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Ospedale di Parma.
Minerva Anestesiol. 1991 Jun;57(6):319-26.
The monitoring of the comatose head injured patients is based on the recording of several data; the intracranial pressure measurements (ICP), associated with the arterial pressure recording, gives a good estimate of the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) but further information about the cerebral perfusion are needed. Based on the assumption that the cerebral metabolic rate is kept constant strong relationships exist between the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the arterovenous difference of oxygen (AVDO2). In order to obtain samples of cerebral venous blood a catheter must be inserted in the internal jugular vein (IJ) with the tip of the cannula reaching the superior jugular bulb. In 224 patients we measured the ICP trough ventricular or subdural catheters; invasive measurement of the arterial pressure was also carried on in all the patients. In 45 patients we measured the AVDO2 and we tested the safety and the reliability of the jugular vein cannulation. During the insertion of the jugular catheters a slight increase of ICP, without any clinical significance, was recorded; in two cases (on a total of 45) accidental carotid puncture occurred. In 9 cases we tested the concordance of the oxygen content between the two IJs; looking at the mean values no statistical difference is detected between the two sides but in some cases relevant differences are recorded. In two cases we inserted the catheters more cranially, reaching a sinus of the cranial basis; the blood collected from these points carries less oxygen that the blood collected in the neck. The rate of infection in this series of ICP monitoring is very low (1.78%) and we had no bleeding at the moment of the insertion of the catheters. Since no significant complications related to the IJ cannulation were recorded we conclude that these techniques are safe and can be easily performed in the clinical setting. Further studies are required in order to investigate the clinical meaning of the differences in the IJs content of oxygen.
对昏迷的头部受伤患者的监测基于多种数据记录;颅内压测量(ICP)与动脉压记录相结合,能较好地估算脑灌注压(CPP),但还需要有关脑灌注的更多信息。基于脑代谢率保持恒定的假设,脑血流量(CBF)与动静脉氧差(AVDO2)之间存在密切关系。为了获取脑静脉血样本,必须将导管插入颈内静脉(IJ),使套管尖端到达颈上球部。在224例患者中,我们通过脑室或硬膜下导管测量了ICP;所有患者均进行了动脉压的有创测量。在45例患者中,我们测量了AVDO2,并测试了颈静脉插管的安全性和可靠性。在插入颈静脉导管过程中,记录到ICP略有升高,但无任何临床意义;在45例患者中有2例发生了意外颈动脉穿刺。在9例患者中,我们测试了双侧颈内静脉氧含量的一致性;从平均值来看,两侧未检测到统计学差异,但在某些情况下记录到了显著差异。在2例患者中,我们将导管插入更靠近头端的位置,到达颅底的一个窦;从这些部位采集的血液含氧量低于在颈部采集的血液。在这一系列ICP监测中感染率非常低(1.78%),并且在插入导管时我们没有出现出血情况。由于未记录到与颈内静脉插管相关的重大并发症,我们得出结论,这些技术是安全的,并且可以在临床环境中轻松实施。需要进一步研究以调查颈内静脉氧含量差异的临床意义。