Baumann Michael H, Lewis Sandra Zelman, Gutterman David
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):1015-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1271. Epub 2007 May 31.
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBGs) can provide an invaluable distillation of knowledge regarding best practices based on the available evidence. EBGs, providing accurate and useful guidance to best clinical practices, require a rigorous development process. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has developed a process that embodies transparency, thoroughness, and timeliness, and effective conflict-of-interest management, and it continues to evolve. This process employs a quantitative and rigorous grading of the strength of recommendations and of the quality of evidence that incorporates sensitivity to health-care resource utilization and patient values and preferences. A review of this process is provided to inform the ACCP membership and those wishing to embark on EBG development.
循证临床实践指南(EBGs)能够基于现有证据,对关于最佳实践的知识进行极有价值的提炼。循证临床实践指南为最佳临床实践提供准确且有用的指导,需要经过严格的制定过程。美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)已经制定了一个体现透明度、全面性、及时性以及有效利益冲突管理的过程,并且该过程还在不断发展。这个过程采用对推荐强度和证据质量进行定量且严格的分级,其中纳入了对医疗保健资源利用以及患者价值观和偏好的敏感性考量。本文对这个过程进行了综述,以便让ACCP成员以及那些希望开展循证临床实践指南制定工作的人了解相关情况。