Suppr超能文献

美国胸科医师学会循证指南制定:一种解决利益冲突、资金问题以及以患者为中心的推荐意见的成功且透明的方法。

ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations.

作者信息

Baumann Michael H, Lewis Sandra Zelman, Gutterman David

机构信息

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):1015-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1271. Epub 2007 May 31.

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBGs) can provide an invaluable distillation of knowledge regarding best practices based on the available evidence. EBGs, providing accurate and useful guidance to best clinical practices, require a rigorous development process. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has developed a process that embodies transparency, thoroughness, and timeliness, and effective conflict-of-interest management, and it continues to evolve. This process employs a quantitative and rigorous grading of the strength of recommendations and of the quality of evidence that incorporates sensitivity to health-care resource utilization and patient values and preferences. A review of this process is provided to inform the ACCP membership and those wishing to embark on EBG development.

摘要

循证临床实践指南(EBGs)能够基于现有证据,对关于最佳实践的知识进行极有价值的提炼。循证临床实践指南为最佳临床实践提供准确且有用的指导,需要经过严格的制定过程。美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)已经制定了一个体现透明度、全面性、及时性以及有效利益冲突管理的过程,并且该过程还在不断发展。这个过程采用对推荐强度和证据质量进行定量且严格的分级,其中纳入了对医疗保健资源利用以及患者价值观和偏好的敏感性考量。本文对这个过程进行了综述,以便让ACCP成员以及那些希望开展循证临床实践指南制定工作的人了解相关情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验