• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胸科医师学会循证指南制定:一种解决利益冲突、资金问题以及以患者为中心的推荐意见的成功且透明的方法。

ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations.

作者信息

Baumann Michael H, Lewis Sandra Zelman, Gutterman David

机构信息

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):1015-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1271. Epub 2007 May 31.

DOI:10.1378/chest.07-1271
PMID:17540835
Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBGs) can provide an invaluable distillation of knowledge regarding best practices based on the available evidence. EBGs, providing accurate and useful guidance to best clinical practices, require a rigorous development process. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has developed a process that embodies transparency, thoroughness, and timeliness, and effective conflict-of-interest management, and it continues to evolve. This process employs a quantitative and rigorous grading of the strength of recommendations and of the quality of evidence that incorporates sensitivity to health-care resource utilization and patient values and preferences. A review of this process is provided to inform the ACCP membership and those wishing to embark on EBG development.

摘要

循证临床实践指南(EBGs)能够基于现有证据,对关于最佳实践的知识进行极有价值的提炼。循证临床实践指南为最佳临床实践提供准确且有用的指导,需要经过严格的制定过程。美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)已经制定了一个体现透明度、全面性、及时性以及有效利益冲突管理的过程,并且该过程还在不断发展。这个过程采用对推荐强度和证据质量进行定量且严格的分级,其中纳入了对医疗保健资源利用以及患者价值观和偏好的敏感性考量。本文对这个过程进行了综述,以便让ACCP成员以及那些希望开展循证临床实践指南制定工作的人了解相关情况。

相似文献

1
ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations.美国胸科医师学会循证指南制定:一种解决利益冲突、资金问题以及以患者为中心的推荐意见的成功且透明的方法。
Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3):1015-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1271. Epub 2007 May 31.
2
Methodology for guideline development for the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.第七届美国胸科医师学会抗栓与溶栓治疗会议指南制定方法:第七届ACCP抗栓与溶栓治疗会议
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):174S-178S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.174S.
3
Guideline funding and conflicts of interest: article 4 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南资助与利益冲突:COPD 指南制定中的整合与协调工作(Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development)的第 4 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会(ATS/ERS)官方工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):234-42. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-057ST.
4
Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in interventional medicine subspecialty guidelines.介入医学亚专科指南中科学证据质量和利益冲突的系统分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jan;89(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.013.
5
A guide to guidelines for professional societies and other developers of recommendations: introduction to integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南:专业学会和其他推荐制定者指南制定指南:在 COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的介绍。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会官方研讨会报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):215-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-053ST.
6
The development of evidence-based prehospital guidelines using a GRADE-based methodology.基于 GRADE 方法制定基于证据的院前指南的发展。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18 Suppl 1:3-14. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844871. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
7
American Academy of Dermatology evidence-based guideline development process: responding to new challenges and establishing transparency.美国皮肤病学会循证指南制定流程:应对新挑战并建立透明度。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jun;64(6):e105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.10.029. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.抗栓治疗与血栓预防指南制定方法:《抗栓治疗与血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南》。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):53S-70S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2288.
9
Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.临床指南中推荐强度分级与证据质量:美国胸科医师学会特别工作组报告
Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1):174-81. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1.174.
10
Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development.肺动脉高压证据审查与指南制定的方法学及分级
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1 Suppl):11S-13S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1_suppl.11S.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Appraisal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma.对神经外科医师协会关于胸腰椎脊柱创伤患者评估与治疗的循证指南的批判性评价
Cureus. 2024 Apr 20;16(4):e58641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58641. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
UEG framework for the development of high-quality clinical guidelines.欧洲胃肠病学联盟制定高质量临床指南的框架。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8):851-864. doi: 10.1177/2050640620950854. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Financial Relationships between Organizations That Produce Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Biomedical Industry: A Cross-Sectional Study.
制定临床实践指南的组织与生物医学行业之间的财务关系:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002029. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use.日常实践使用的指南评估迷你检查表的效度和信度
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 2;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0139-x.
5
Perspectives on the revised Ghent criteria for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome.关于马凡氏综合征诊断的修订版根特标准的观点
Appl Clin Genet. 2015 Jun 16;8:137-55. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S60472. eCollection 2015.
6
Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.临床实践指南的评估工具:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 9;8(12):e82915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082915. eCollection 2013.
7
Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.患者对 2 型糖尿病治疗的偏好:综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Oct;31(10):877-92. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0089-7.
8
How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community.我们“应该”如何撰写指南推荐意见?临床实践指南中道义术语的解读:医疗卫生服务界调查
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):509-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032565. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
9
Canadian Thoracic Society: Presenting a new process for clinical practice guideline production.加拿大胸科学会:呈现一种新的临床实践指南制定流程。
Can Respir J. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):e62-8. doi: 10.1155/2009/397818.
10
[Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation - pro and con].[心肺复苏后的治疗性低温——支持与反对]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(21-22):627-33. doi: 10.1007/s10354-008-0611-2.