Basting Roberta Tarkany, Rodrigues Antonio Luiz Júnior, Serra Mônica Campos
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Research Center São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Am J Dent. 2007 Apr;20(2):97-102.
To evaluate the micromorphology and surface roughness of sound and demineralized enamel and dentin treated with a 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent in situ for 3 weeks.
A 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent, Opalescence (OPA) was evaluated and a placebo agent (PLA) not containing carbamide peroxide, was used as a control group. Forty dental slabs [10 sound enamel slabs (SE), 10 demineralized enamel slabs (DE), 10 sound dentin slabs (SD) and 10 demineralized dentin slabs (DD)] were randomly fixed on the facial surface of the first maxillary molars and second maxillary premolars of 10 volunteers. Demineralized enamel and dentin fragments were obtained by a dynamic model using demineralizing and remineralizing solutions. The volunteers were divided into two groups that received the bleaching or the placebo agent in different sequences and periods in a double blind 2 x 2 cross-over study with a wash-out period of 2 weeks. Roughness was performed on the slab surfaces followed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluations. The images were evaluated by three calibrated examiners in duplicate in two different periods at x1500 (SE and DE) and x2000 original magnification (SD and DD).
The Wilcoxon test showed significant differences in roughness for SE and DE treated with OPA or PLA, with rougher surfaces treated with OPA. No differences in roughness were observed for SD or DD treated with OPA or PLA. As the Kappa value for the inter-examiner agreement of SEM evaluations showed "moderate" reproducibility (0.41 < k< 0.60) in Period 1 and "substantial" (0.61 < k < 0.8) in Period 2, the latter was considered for the statistical analysis. The McNemar test showed no significant differences between SE, DE, SD or DD treated with OPA or PLA.
评估用10%过氧化脲漂白剂原位处理3周的完好及脱矿釉质和牙本质的微观形态和表面粗糙度。
评估10%过氧化脲漂白剂欧帕丽白(OPA),并使用不含过氧化脲的安慰剂(PLA)作为对照组。将40个牙片[10个完好釉质片(SE)、10个脱矿釉质片(DE)、10个完好牙本质片(SD)和10个脱矿牙本质片(DD)]随机固定在10名志愿者上颌第一磨牙和第二前磨牙的颊面。脱矿釉质和牙本质碎片通过使用脱矿和再矿化溶液的动态模型获得。在一项双盲2×2交叉研究中,志愿者被分为两组,在不同顺序和时间段接受漂白剂或安慰剂,洗脱期为2周。对牙片表面进行粗糙度测量,随后进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估。图像由三名经过校准的检查人员在两个不同时间段以x1500(SE和DE)和x2000原始放大倍数(SD和DD)进行两次重复评估。
Wilcoxon检验显示,用OPA或PLA处理的SE和DE在粗糙度上有显著差异,用OPA处理的表面更粗糙。用OPA或PLA处理的SD或DD在粗糙度上未观察到差异。由于SEM评估的检查者间一致性的Kappa值在第1期显示为“中等”再现性(0.41<k<0.60),在第2期显示为“高度”(0.61<k<0.8),因此在统计分析中考虑后者。McNemar检验显示,用OPA或PLA处理的SE、DE、SD或DD之间无显著差异。