• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Exposure of biota in the cooling pond of Ignalina NPP: hydrophytes.

作者信息

Nedveckaite T, Filistovic V, Marciulioniene D, Kiponas D, Remeikis V, Beresford N A

机构信息

Institute of Physics, Radiation Protection, Savanoriu Avenue 231, LT-02053 Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Environ Radioact. 2007;97(2-3):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.03.011
PMID:17544183
Abstract

The radiological assessment of non-human biota is now accepted by a number of international bodies. In this connection the scientific basis to assess and evaluate biota internal and external radiation exposure is required. This paper presents the comparison of freshwater biota (hydrophyte species) exposure due to discharged anthropogenic radionuclides with that due to natural background radiation. The radionuclides from Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant (Lithuania) are discharged into cooling pond - Druksiai Lake. Submerged hydrophytes were selected as biota exposure indicators because they represent the largest biomass in this lake and have comparatively high radionuclide activity concentrations. The detailed methodology evaluation of the submerged hydrophyte dose rate is presented. The ionizing radiation exposure dose rates to submerged hydrophyte roots and above sediment parts due to the major radionuclides ((54)Mn, (60)Co, (137)Cs, (90)Sr) discharged into the INPP cooling pond - Druksiai Lake were 0.044 microGyh(-1) and 0.004 microGyh(-1), respectively. The internal exposure dose rate due to natural background alpha-emitters ((210)Po,(238)U, (226)Ra) was estimated to be 1.24 microGyh(-1), as compared with that of anthropogenic alpha-emitter (240)Pu - 0.04 microGyh(-1), whereas the external exposure was 0.069 microGyh(-1). The presented data deeper the knowledge about the concentration of radionuclides and submerged hydrophytes' exposure dose rates in European freshwater ecosystems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Exposure of biota in the cooling pond of Ignalina NPP: hydrophytes.
J Environ Radioact. 2007;97(2-3):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
2
Background and anthropogenic radionuclide derived dose rates to freshwater ecosystem: nuclear power plant cooling pond: reference organisms.背景与人为放射性核素衍生剂量率对淡水生态系统的影响:核电厂冷却池:参考生物。
J Environ Radioact. 2011 Aug;102(8):788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
The assessment of ionising radiation impact on the cooling pond freshwater ecosystem non-human biota from the Ignalina NPP operation beginning to shut down and initial decommissioning.对从伊格纳利纳核电站运营开始到关闭及初步退役期间,电离辐射对冷却池淡水生态系统非人类生物区系影响的评估。
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Jan;151 Pt 1:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Anthropogenic radionuclide fluxes and distribution in bottom sediments of the cooling basin of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant.人为放射性核素通量及其在伊格纳利纳核电站冷却池底沉积物中的分布。
J Environ Radioact. 2015 Jul;145:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
Radiation dose assessment for the biota of terrestrial ecosystems in the shoreline zone of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant cooling pond.切尔诺贝利核电站冷却池滨岸带陆地生态系统生物辐射剂量评估。
Health Phys. 2011 Oct;101(4):349-61. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182242e02.
6
Application of the ERICA Assessment Tool to freshwater biota in Finland.应用 ERICA 评估工具对芬兰淡水生物群进行评估。
J Environ Radioact. 2010 Jan;101(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
7
Evaluation of doses from ionising radiation to non-human species at Trombay, Mumbai, India.印度孟买 Trombay 地区对非人类物种的电离辐射剂量评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009 Feb;133(4):214-22. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncp048. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Radionuclide transfer to freshwater biota species: review of Russian language studies.放射性核素向淡水生物种的转移:俄语研究综述。
J Environ Radioact. 2011 Jan;102(1):8-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
Toxicity to Tradescantia of technogenic radionuclides and their mixture with heavy metals.技术源放射性核素及其与重金属混合物对紫露草的毒性。
Environ Toxicol. 2004 Aug;19(4):346-50. doi: 10.1002/tox.20040.
10
The distribution of tritium in aquatic environments, Lithuania.立陶宛水生环境中氚的分布。
J Environ Radioact. 2018 Aug;188:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial patterns and ratios of ¹³⁷Cs, ⁹⁰Sr, and Pu isotopes in the top layer of undisturbed meadow soils as indicators for contamination origin.未扰动草甸土壤表层中¹³⁷Cs、⁹⁰Sr和钚同位素的空间分布模式及比率作为污染来源的指标
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 May;187(5):268. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4491-9. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
2
Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota.
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2008 Nov;47(4):491-514. doi: 10.1007/s00411-008-0186-8. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
3
Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota.非人类生物群吸收剂量率的相互比较。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007 Nov;46(4):349-73. doi: 10.1007/s00411-007-0124-1. Epub 2007 Jul 31.