• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在TRANSBIG多中心独立验证系列中,76基因预后特征对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者具有强烈的时间依赖性。

Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series.

作者信息

Desmedt Christine, Piette Fanny, Loi Sherene, Wang Yixin, Lallemand Françoise, Haibe-Kains Benjamin, Viale Giuseppe, Delorenzi Mauro, Zhang Yi, d'Assignies Mahasti Saghatchian, Bergh Jonas, Lidereau Rosette, Ellis Paul, Harris Adrian L, Klijn Jan G M, Foekens John A, Cardoso Fatima, Piccart Martine J, Buyse Marc, Sotiriou Christos

机构信息

Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3207-14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765
PMID:17545524
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recently, a 76-gene prognostic signature able to predict distant metastases in lymph node-negative (N(-)) breast cancer patients was reported. The aims of this study conducted by TRANSBIG were to independently validate these results and to compare the outcome with clinical risk assessment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gene expression profiling of frozen samples from 198 N(-) systemically untreated patients was done at the Bordet Institute, blinded to clinical data and independent of Veridex. Genomic risk was defined by Veridex, blinded to clinical data. Survival analyses, done by an independent statistician, were done with the genomic risk and adjusted for the clinical risk, defined by Adjuvant! Online.

RESULTS

The actual 5- and 10-year time to distant metastasis were 98% (88-100%) and 94% (83-98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 76% (68-82%) and 73% (65-79%), respectively, for the poor profile group. The actual 5- and 10-year overall survival were 98% (88-100%) and 87% (73-94%), respectively, for the good profile group and 84% (77-89%) and 72% (63-78%), respectively, for the poor profile group. We observed a strong time dependence of this signature, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio of 13.58 (1.85-99.63) and 8.20 (1.10-60.90) at 5 years and 5.11 (1.57-16.67) and 2.55 (1.07-6.10) at 10 years for time to distant metastasis and overall survival, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This independent validation confirmed the performance of the 76-gene signature and adds to the growing evidence that gene expression signatures are of clinical relevance, especially for identifying patients at high risk of early distant metastases.

摘要

目的

最近,有报道称一种76基因预后特征能够预测淋巴结阴性(N(-))乳腺癌患者的远处转移情况。TRANSBIG开展的这项研究旨在独立验证这些结果,并将结果与临床风险评估进行比较。

实验设计

在博尔德研究所对198例未经全身治疗的N(-)患者的冷冻样本进行基因表达谱分析,分析过程对临床数据保密且与Veridex无关。由Veridex在对临床数据保密的情况下定义基因组风险。由独立统计学家进行生存分析,分析时考虑基因组风险并根据由Adjuvant! Online定义的临床风险进行校正。

结果

良好特征组实际发生远处转移的5年和10年时间分别为98%(88 - 100%)和94%(83 - 98%),不良特征组分别为76%(68 - 82%)和73%(65 - 79%)。良好特征组实际的5年和10年总生存率分别为98%(88 - 100%)和87%(73 - 94%),不良特征组分别为84%(77 - 89%)和72%(63 - 78%)。我们观察到该特征具有很强的时间依赖性,对于远处转移时间,5年时校正风险比为13.58(1.85 - 99.63),10年时为8.20(1.10 - 60.90);对于总生存率,5年时校正风险比为5.11(1.57 - 16.67),10年时为2.55(1.07 - 6.10)。

结论

这项独立验证证实了76基因特征的性能,并进一步证明基因表达特征具有临床相关性,特别是对于识别早期远处转移高风险患者。

相似文献

1
Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series.在TRANSBIG多中心独立验证系列中,76基因预后特征对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者具有强烈的时间依赖性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3207-14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2765.
2
Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.70基因预后特征对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌女性患者的验证及临床应用价值
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1183-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj329.
3
Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer.70基因预后特征在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的验证
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Oct;117(3):483-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0191-2. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
4
The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study.在一项独立验证研究中,70基因预后特征可预测1-3个淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者的疾病转归。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0130-2. Epub 2008 Jul 27.
5
A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.一种作为乳腺癌生存预测指标的基因表达特征。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967.
6
Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer.基于基因表达的预后特征在淋巴结阴性原发性乳腺癌中的多中心验证
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 10;24(11):1665-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9115. Epub 2006 Feb 27.
7
Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer.预测淋巴结阴性原发性乳腺癌远处转移的基因表达谱。
Lancet. 2005;365(9460):671-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17947-1.
8
Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer.乳腺癌预后基因表达特征的比较
BMC Genomics. 2008 Aug 21;9:394. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-394.
9
Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER).使用70基因特征预测淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的预后:一项基于社区的前瞻性可行性研究(RASTER)
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70346-7. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
Additional value and potential use of the 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer in daily clinical practice.在日常临床实践中,70 基因预后标记物在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的附加价值和潜在用途。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2021-2030. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp547. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor Immune Response as a Biomarker for Metastasis-Free Survival of Breast Cancer and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.肿瘤免疫反应作为乳腺癌无转移生存期和免疫检查点抑制治疗的生物标志物:一项回顾性队列研究
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2025 Aug 24;19:11782234251363665. doi: 10.1177/11782234251363665. eCollection 2025.
2
FPR3 orchestrates macrophage polarization in breast cancer: multi-omics dissection of prognostic relevance and therapeutic targeting.FPR3调控乳腺癌中的巨噬细胞极化:预后相关性和治疗靶点的多组学剖析
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03942-4.
3
Residual Breast Cancer Cells Co-opt SOX5-driven Endochondral Ossification to Maintain Dormancy.
残留乳腺癌细胞利用SOX5驱动的软骨内成骨来维持休眠状态。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 10:2025.05.07.652632. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.07.652632.
4
A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Applications with Multi-Omics Data in Cancer Research.癌症研究中多组学数据深度学习应用的综合综述
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 28;16(6):648. doi: 10.3390/genes16060648.
5
Elucidating the Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Insulin Resistance Genes in Breast Cancer: A Machine Learning-Powered Analysis.阐明胰岛素抵抗基因在乳腺癌中的预后和治疗意义:一项机器学习驱动的分析。
Biology (Basel). 2025 May 13;14(5):539. doi: 10.3390/biology14050539.
6
Refining prognostic tools for luminal breast cancer: genetic insights and comprehensive analysis.优化管腔型乳腺癌的预后评估工具:遗传学见解与综合分析
ESMO Open. 2025 Apr 29;10(5):105080. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105080.
7
Ternary Complex Components Responsible for Rapid LDL Internalization as Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Associated with Proliferation and Early Recurrence.负责快速低密度脂蛋白内化的三元复合物成分作为与增殖和早期复发相关的乳腺癌生物标志物。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Feb 1;5(2):226-239. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0562.
8
Osteopontin is a therapeutic target that drives breast cancer recurrence.骨桥蛋白是一种促进乳腺癌复发的治疗靶点。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 24;15(1):9174. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53023-9.
9
Decorin, an exercise-induced secretory protein, is associated with improved prognosis in breast cancer patients but does not mediate anti-tumorigenic tissue crosstalk in mice.核心蛋白聚糖是一种运动诱导分泌蛋白,与乳腺癌患者预后改善相关,但在小鼠中不介导抗肿瘤组织间相互作用。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Sep 26;14:100991. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100991.
10
Privacy-Preserving Federated Survival Support Vector Machines for Cross-Institutional Time-To-Event Analysis: Algorithm Development and Validation.用于跨机构事件发生时间分析的隐私保护联合生存支持向量机:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2024 Mar 29;3:e47652. doi: 10.2196/47652.