van Dyck Christopher H, Tariot Pierre N, Meyers Barnett, Malca Resnick E
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007 Apr-Jun;21(2):136-43. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318065c495.
This study examined the efficacy and safety of memantine monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer disease (AD). Patients not receiving a cholinesterase inhibitor (N=350) were randomized to receive memantine (20 mg/d) or placebo during this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Prospectively defined analyses failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of memantine treatment compared with placebo on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at week 24 end point, although a significant advantage was observed for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. The 19-item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL19) did not differ significantly between groups in any analysis. Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) did not significantly favor memantine at week 24 despite a significant advantage for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. Other secondary outcomes showed no significant treatment differences. Post hoc analyses of potentially confounding covariates and alternative methods of imputing missing data did not substantially alter the results. Because of the violations of normality assumptions for the SIB and ADCS-ADL19, nonparametric analyses were performed; statistically significant benefit of memantine over placebo was demonstrated at week 24 for the SIB but not the ADCS-ADL19. The type and incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups.
本研究考察了美金刚单药治疗中重度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的疗效和安全性。在这项为期24周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,未接受胆碱酯酶抑制剂的患者(N = 350)被随机分为接受美金刚(20 mg/天)或安慰剂治疗。预先设定的分析未能证明在第24周终点时,与安慰剂相比,美金刚治疗在严重损害量表(SIB)上有统计学显著益处,尽管在第12周和第18周时美金刚显示出显著优势。在任何分析中,19项阿尔茨海默病协作研究日常生活活动量表(ADCS-ADL19)在两组之间均无显著差异。基于临床医生访谈的变化印象加照顾者意见(CIBIC-Plus)在第24周时并未显著倾向于美金刚,尽管在第12周和第18周时美金刚有显著优势。其他次要结局显示治疗差异不显著。对潜在混杂协变量的事后分析以及插补缺失数据的替代方法并未实质性改变结果。由于SIB和ADCS-ADL19违反了正态性假设,因此进行了非参数分析;在第24周时,美金刚在SIB上显示出优于安慰剂的统计学显著益处,但在ADCS-ADL19上未显示。两组不良事件的类型和发生率相似。