• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动式教学:概念分析

Interactive teaching: a concept analysis.

作者信息

Ridley Renee T

机构信息

Murray State University, Department of Nursing, Murray, Kentucky 42071, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2007 May;46(5):203-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20070501-03.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20070501-03
PMID:17547343
Abstract

Interactive teaching is conceptually analyzed using the strategies of Walker and Avant to promote a common understanding of interactive teaching and to clearly explicate interactive teaching characteristics that will foster the construct validity of using interactive teaching in pedagogical research. In doing so, nurse researchers will be able to better understand and integrate interactive teaching into their research protocols, ultimately providing evidence for educators to use in determining the most effective teaching methods to incorporate into curricula. Interactive teaching is defined and examined using relevant sources; related concepts are analyzed and compared with these definitions. Antecedents, critical attributes, and consequences of interactive teaching are identified and applied in model, borderline, and contrary cases. Concluding remarks and suggestions are presented.

摘要

运用沃克和阿凡特的策略对互动式教学进行概念分析,以促进对互动式教学的共同理解,并清晰阐释互动式教学的特点,这些特点将有助于提高互动式教学在教学研究中的建构效度。这样一来,护理研究人员将能够更好地理解互动式教学并将其纳入研究方案,最终为教育工作者提供证据,以便他们确定最有效的教学方法并纳入课程。利用相关资料对互动式教学进行定义和审视;分析相关概念并与这些定义进行比较。确定互动式教学的前因、关键属性和后果,并应用于典型案例、临界案例和相反案例。最后给出结论和建议。

相似文献

1
Interactive teaching: a concept analysis.互动式教学:概念分析
J Nurs Educ. 2007 May;46(5):203-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20070501-03.
2
E-learning: is this teaching at students or teaching with students?电子学习:这是对着学生教学还是与学生一起教学?
Nurs Forum. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00085.x.
3
Learner-centered characteristics of nurse educators.护士教育工作者以学习者为中心的特点。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article6. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1710. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
4
Towards a plurality of perspectives for nurse educators.迈向护士教育工作者的多元视角。
Nurs Philos. 2007 Jan;8(1):49-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00297.x.
5
Engaging the students and the teacher: co-creating substantive reform with narrative pedagogy.让学生和教师参与进来:用叙事教学法共同创造实质性改革。
J Nurs Educ. 2005 Jun;44(6):249-52. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20050601-02.
6
A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing.一个用于设计、实施和评估用作护理教学策略的模拟的框架。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):96-103.
7
The good clinical nursing educator and the baccalaureate nursing clinical experience: attributes and praxis.优秀的临床护理教育工作者与护理学学士学位临床经验:特质与实践
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Jan;47(1):38-42. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080101-04.
8
A need for clarity: scholarship, scholarly teaching, and the scholarship of teaching and learning.对清晰度的需求:学术研究、学术教学以及教学与学习的学术研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):235-6.
9
A model for easily incorporating team-based learning into nursing education.一种便于将基于团队的学习纳入护理教育的模式。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article4. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1924. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
10
The scholarship of teaching: implications for nursing faculty.教学学术:对护理教师的启示
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.002.