Clark Steven L, Belfort Michael A, Hankins Gary D V, Meyers Janet A, Houser Frank M
Hospital Corporation of America, Division of Perinatal Safety, Nashville, TN, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):526.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.024.
This study was undertaken to examine the national and regional rates of operative delivery among almost one quarter million births in a single year in the nation's largest healthcare delivery system, using variation as an arbiter of the quality of decision making.
We compared the variation in rates of primary cesarean and operative vaginal delivery in facilities of the Hospital Corporation of America during the year 2004.
In 124 facilities representing almost 220,000 births during a 1-year period, the primary cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates were 19% +/- 5% (range 9-37) and 7% +/- 4% (range 1-23). Within individual geographic regions, we consistently found variations of 200-300% in rates of primary cesarean delivery and variations approximating an order of magnitude for operative vaginal delivery.
Within broad upper and lower limits, rates of operative delivery in the United States are highly variable and suggest a pattern of almost random decision making. This reflects a lack of sufficient reliable, outcomes-based data to guide clinical decision making.
本研究旨在利用差异作为决策质量的仲裁标准,对美国最大的医疗服务体系中近25万例单年出生病例的全国及地区手术分娩率进行研究。
我们比较了2004年美国医院公司各机构中初次剖宫产和手术阴道分娩率的差异。
在124个机构中,1年期间有近22万例分娩,初次剖宫产率和手术阴道分娩率分别为19%±5%(范围9 - 37)和7%±4%(范围1 - 23)。在各个地理区域内,我们始终发现初次剖宫产率的差异为200 - 300%,手术阴道分娩率的差异接近一个数量级。
在美国,手术分娩率在宽泛的上下限范围内高度可变,表明存在近乎随机的决策模式。这反映出缺乏足够可靠的、基于结果的数据来指导临床决策。