Suppr超能文献

妇产科教员流失问题。

Faculty attrition in obstetrics and gynecology.

作者信息

Autry Amy, Irby David, Hodgson Carol

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):603.e1-4; discussion 603.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore why obstetrician/gynecologists leave academic practice.

STUDY DESIGN

From a sample of 5000 ACOG fellows, we identified obstetrician/gynecologists in faculty positions and those who had left academic practice. These groups were sent a survey to explore aspects of job satisfaction. Relationships between variables were tested using chi2 analyses. Means were computed for each subscale and differences between current and past faculty were tested with a multivariate analysis of variance model.

RESULTS

There was a 65% response rate to the job satisfaction survey for a total of 280 current faculty and 146 previous faculty. There was no difference between the groups in job satisfaction. Faculty rated opportunities for teaching and administration more important as components of job satisfaction. Practitioners who left academics were more likely to be previous junior faculty and generalists.

CONCLUSION

Junior faculty and generalists are more likely to leave academic practice than senior faculty and subspecialists.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨妇产科医生离开学术岗位的原因。

研究设计

从5000名美国妇产科医师学会会员样本中,我们确定了担任教职的妇产科医生以及那些已离开学术岗位的医生。向这些群体发放了一份调查问卷,以探究工作满意度的各个方面。使用卡方分析检验变量之间的关系。计算每个子量表的均值,并通过多变量方差分析模型检验现任和前任教职员工之间的差异。

结果

工作满意度调查的回复率为65%,共有280名现任教职员工和146名前任教职员工参与。两组在工作满意度方面没有差异。教职员工认为教学和管理机会作为工作满意度的组成部分更为重要。离开学术界的从业者更有可能是前任初级教职员工和全科医生。

结论

初级教职员工和全科医生比高级教职员工和专科医生更有可能离开学术岗位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验