McGowan J E
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13 Suppl 10:S879-89. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s879.
Cost-benefit analysis of perioperative prophylaxis with antimicrobial agents involves efforts in two main areas: first, economic aspects of a decision whether or not to use prophylaxis are examined; and second, the financial benefit of a drug or regimen is compared with that of the currently used drug or regimen. Both cost and benefit have a number of components, both direct and indirect; methods are available for the analysis of some of these components. Systematic economic analysis permits evaluation of the relative importance and magnitude of the various elements of cost and benefit. Often the analysis shows that information about one or more elements is not worth collecting because it will have minor or no impact. Failure to clearly identify the viewpoints of persons interpreting the data hinders analysis; systematic economic analysis makes these differences in viewpoint clearer. Convincing economic data in favor of prophylaxis exist for some operative procedures; hospitals should insist that these regimens be implemented. Surgical wound infection is the only type of nosocomial infection for which a consistent drop in rate of occurrence has been seen during the past decade. This drop undoubtedly is related in part to the perioperative use of antimicrobial agents. Perhaps these results constitute the best cost-benefit assessment of all.
首先,考察决定是否使用预防措施的经济因素;其次,将一种药物或用药方案的经济效益与当前使用的药物或用药方案进行比较。成本和效益都包含许多直接和间接的组成部分;有一些方法可用于分析其中的某些组成部分。系统的经济分析能够评估成本和效益各要素的相对重要性和规模。分析常常表明,关于一个或多个要素的信息不值得收集,因为其影响很小或没有影响。未能明确界定解读数据人员的观点会妨碍分析;系统的经济分析能使这些观点差异更加清晰。对于某些手术操作,存在支持预防措施的有说服力的经济数据;医院应坚持实施这些用药方案。手术伤口感染是过去十年中发生率持续下降的唯一一种医院感染类型。这种下降无疑部分与围手术期使用抗菌药物有关。或许这些结果构成了所有情况中最佳的成本效益评估。