Turanli Sevim
Department of General Surgery, Oncology Education and Research Hospital, 06200 Demetevler/Ankara, Turkey.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;136(6):957-60. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.013.
This study was to compare the types of therapeutic neck dissection in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Sixty-one patients with lymph node metastasis in the neck, treated between 1997 and 2001, were studied retrospectively. A comparative study was made of a selective lateral neck dissection group and a radical or modified radical neck dissection group for recurrence, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
Type of dissection was not related to DFS (P=0.92), OS (P=0.33), and local recurrence ratio (P=0.56). The factors affecting local recurrence were the age over 45 years (P=0.02), tumor size (0.005), and the presence of distant metastasis (P=0.04). The factors affecting DFS and OS were tumor size (0.003), thyroid capsule invasion (0.004).
Determination of the type of therapeutic neck dissection depends on patient and tumor characteristics. Selective lateral neck dissection can be applied safely in selected cases.
本研究旨在比较分化型甲状腺癌患者治疗性颈清扫术的类型。
回顾性研究1997年至2001年间接受治疗的61例颈部淋巴结转移患者。对选择性侧颈清扫组与根治性或改良根治性颈清扫组的复发情况、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)进行比较研究。
清扫类型与DFS(P = 0.92)、OS(P = 0.33)及局部复发率(P = 0.56)无关。影响局部复发的因素为年龄超过45岁(P = 0.02)、肿瘤大小(P = 0.005)及远处转移的存在(P = 0.04)。影响DFS和OS的因素为肿瘤大小(P = 0.003)、甲状腺被膜侵犯(P = 0.004)。
治疗性颈清扫术类型的确定取决于患者和肿瘤特征。选择性侧颈清扫术可在特定病例中安全应用。