Nadeau Chantal
Communication Studies, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.
J Lesbian Stud. 2005;9(4):89-105. doi: 10.1300/J155v09n04_07.
Within the context of a discussion of lesbian academic couples there is something to be said about the (dis)pleasures and profits of a heteronormative practice such as spousal hiring and how much this privilege reveals the broader systemic discrimination vis-à-vis sexual and gender claims in our academic institutions. Two issues emerge from its (questionable) application: (1) How a privilege such as spousal hiring intersects with institutional policies concerning sexual diversity; and in light of this, (2)Why queer or lesbian couples shouldn't embrace dubious spousal hiring incentives.
在关于女同性恋学者伴侣的讨论背景下，有必要谈谈异性规范做法（如配偶雇佣）的（不）愉快与益处，以及这种特权在多大程度上揭示了我们学术机构中针对性取向和性别主张的更广泛系统性歧视。从其（有问题的）应用中出现了两个问题：（1）配偶雇佣这样的特权如何与关于性取向多样性的机构政策相交；鉴于此，（2）为什么同性恋或女同性恋伴侣不应接受可疑的配偶雇佣激励措施。
