• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于采用有逃避消退和无逃避消退的暂停法治疗逃避维持的不依从行为的实证研究。

An empirical investigation of time-out with and without escape extinction to treat escape-maintained noncompliance.

作者信息

Everett Gregory E, Joe Olmi D, Edwards Ron P, Tingstrom Daniel H, Sterling-Turner Heather E, Christ Theodore J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026-1121, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2007 Jul;31(4):412-34. doi: 10.1177/0145445506297725.

DOI:10.1177/0145445506297725
PMID:17548538
Abstract

The present study evaluates the effectiveness of two time-out (TO) procedures in reducing escape-maintained noncompliance of 4 children. Noncompliant behavioral function was established via a functional assessment (FA), including indirect and direct descriptive procedures and brief confirmatory experimental analyses. Following FA, parents were taught to consequate noncompliance with two different TO procedures, one without and one with escape extinction following TO release. Although results indicate TO without escape extinction is effective in increasing compliance above baseline levels, more optimal levels of compliance were obtained for all 4 children when escape extinction was added to the TO procedures already in place. Results indicate efficacy of TO with escape extinction when applied to escape-maintained noncompliance and are discussed as an initial example of the successful application of TO to behaviors maintained by negative reinforcement.

摘要

本研究评估了两种暂停(TO)程序在减少4名儿童逃避维持的不依从行为方面的有效性。通过功能评估(FA)确定不依从行为的功能,包括间接和直接描述性程序以及简短的验证性实验分析。在功能评估之后,教导父母对不依从行为采用两种不同的暂停程序进行处理,一种是在暂停结束后不进行逃避消退,另一种是在暂停结束后进行逃避消退。尽管结果表明,不进行逃避消退的暂停程序在将依从性提高到基线水平以上方面是有效的,但当在现有的暂停程序中加入逃避消退时,所有4名儿童都获得了更理想的依从水平。结果表明,带有逃避消退的暂停程序在应用于逃避维持的不依从行为时是有效的,并作为将暂停程序成功应用于由负强化维持的行为的一个初步例子进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
An empirical investigation of time-out with and without escape extinction to treat escape-maintained noncompliance.一项关于采用有逃避消退和无逃避消退的暂停法治疗逃避维持的不依从行为的实证研究。
Behav Modif. 2007 Jul;31(4):412-34. doi: 10.1177/0145445506297725.
2
Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.逃避行为治疗中阳性强化与阴性强化之间的竞争
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):285-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285.
3
Combining stimulus fading, reinforcement, and extinction to treat food refusal.结合刺激消退、强化和消退来治疗食物拒绝。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):691-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-691.
4
An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal.对两种采用逃避消退法的差别强化程序治疗食物拒绝行为的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Winter;35(4):363-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-363.
5
Systematic evaluation of variables that contribute to noncompliance: a replication and extension.系统评估导致不依从的变量:复制和扩展。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;45(3):607-11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-607.
6
Counseling parents of children with behavior problems: the use of extinction and time-out techniques.
Pediatrics. 1977 Jan;59(1):78-85.
7
Momentum versus extinction effects in the treatment of self-injurious escape behavior.治疗自伤性逃避行为中的动量与消退效应
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):135-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-135.
8
Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model.解开蓄意自我伤害之谜:经验性回避模型。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Mar;44(3):371-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.005.
9
On the relative contributions of noncontingent reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.非偶然性强化和消退在食物拒绝治疗中的相对作用
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Spring;37(1):27-42. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-27.
10
Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.自我伤害性逃避行为的实验分析与消退
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):11-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review.与幼儿的“暂停时间”:亲子互动疗法(PCIT)从业者述评。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010145.
2
Internet guidance on time out: inaccuracies, omissions, and what to tell parents instead.网络上关于“time out”的指导:不准确、不完整,以及应该告诉家长的内容。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 May;35(4):239-46. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000059.
3
Task engagement and escape maintained challenging behavior: differential effects of general and explicit cues when implementing a signaled delay in the delivery of reinforcement.
任务参与和逃避维持挑战性行为:实施强化物传递信号延迟时,一般线索和明确线索的不同影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Jun;40(6):709-20. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0946-6.