Spannow Anne Helene, Stenboeg Elisabeth, Pfeiffer-Jensen Mogens, Herlin Troels
Department of Pediatric, Aarhus University Hospital, Section Skejby Hospital, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2007 Apr 2;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-5-3.
Loss of joint cartilage is a feature of destructive disease in JIA. The cartilage of most joints can be visualized with ultrasonography (US). Our present study focuses on discriminant validity of US in children. We studied reproducibility between and within a skilled and a non-skilled investigator of US assessment of cartilage thickness in small and large joints in healthy children.
In 11 healthy children (5 girls/6 boys), aged 9.6 years (9.3-10 years), 110 joints were examined. Cartilage thickness of the right and left hip, knee, ankle, 2nd metacarpophalangeal (MCP), and 2nd proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint independently. The joints were examined twice, two days apart by a skilled and a non-skilled investigator. Mean cartilage thickness in the five joints was: hip 2.59 +/- 0.41, knee 3.67 +/- 0.64, ankle 1.08 +/- 0.31, MCP 1.52 +/- 0.27 and PIP 0.73 +/- 0.15 mm. We found the same mean differences in CTh of 0.6 mm in the inter-observer part with regard of the PIP joint. Within investigators (intra-observer), the smallest mean difference of CTh was found in the MCP joint with -0.004 (skilled) and 0.013 mm (non-skilled).
We found the level of agreement between observers within a 95% Confidence Interval in assessment of cartilage thickness in hip-, knee-, ankle-, MCP-, and PIP joints in healthy children. Observer variability seems not to relate to joint size but to the positioning of the joints and the transducer. These factors seem to be of major importance for reproducible US measurements. The smallest difference in measurement of cartilage thickness between observers was found in the PIP joint, and within observers in the MCP joint and it seems that using EULAR standard US guidelines is feasible for a pediatric setting. The use of US in children is promising. Studies on larger groups of children are needed to confirm the validation and variability of US in children as well as determining the smallest detectable difference of US measures.
关节软骨缺失是幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)破坏性疾病的一个特征。大多数关节的软骨可用超声检查(US)可视化。我们目前的研究聚焦于超声在儿童中的判别效度。我们研究了熟练和非熟练检查者对健康儿童小关节和大关节软骨厚度进行超声评估时,检查者之间以及检查者自身的可重复性。
对11名健康儿童(5名女孩/6名男孩)进行检查,年龄为9.6岁(9.3 - 10岁),共检查110个关节。分别独立测量左右髋关节、膝关节、踝关节、第二掌指关节(MCP)和第二近端指间关节(PIP)的软骨厚度。由一名熟练检查者和一名非熟练检查者对这些关节进行两次检查,间隔两天。五个关节的平均软骨厚度分别为:髋关节2.59±0.41,膝关节3.67±0.64,踝关节1.08±0.31,MCP关节1.52±0.27,PIP关节0.73±0.15毫米。我们发现在检查者之间部分,关于PIP关节,软骨厚度(CTh)的平均差异为0.6毫米。在检查者自身(检查者内部),CTh的最小平均差异在MCP关节,熟练检查者为 -0.004毫米,非熟练检查者为0.013毫米。
我们发现在95%置信区间内,检查者之间在评估健康儿童髋关节、膝关节、踝关节、MCP关节和PIP关节软骨厚度方面具有一致性水平。检查者的变异性似乎与关节大小无关,而与关节和换能器的位置有关。这些因素似乎对超声测量的可重复性至关重要。检查者之间软骨厚度测量的最小差异在PIP关节,检查者自身的最小差异在MCP关节,并且似乎采用欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)标准超声指南在儿科环境中是可行的。超声在儿童中的应用前景广阔。需要对更大规模的儿童群体进行研究,以确认超声在儿童中的有效性和变异性,以及确定超声测量的最小可检测差异。