Suppr超能文献

这位患者患有痴呆症吗?

Does this patient have dementia?

作者信息

Holsinger Tracey, Deveau Janie, Boustani Malaz, Williams John W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2391-404. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.21.2391.

Abstract

CONTEXT

While as many as 5 million individuals in the United States have dementia, many others have memory complaints. Brief tests to screen for cognitive impairment could help guide dementia diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature concerning the practicality and accuracy of brief cognitive screening instruments in primary care.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE (including data from AIDSLINE, BioethicsLine, and HealthSTAR) and psycINFO was conducted from January 2000 through April 2006 to update previous reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies of patients aged 60 years and older and use of an acceptable criterion standard to diagnose dementia were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers for eligibility and quality. A third independent reviewer adjudicated disagreements. Data for likelihood ratios (LRs) were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-nine studies using 25 different screening instruments met inclusion criteria; some studies evaluated several different instruments, thus, information could be examined for 38 unique instrument/study combinations.

RESULTS

For the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination, the median LR for a positive result was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-47.0) and the median LR for a negative result was 0.19 (95%CI, 0.06-0.37). Briefer approaches are available but have not been studied as frequently. Reports from an informant that the patient has memory loss yields an LR of 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-9.6) for dementia. The Memory Impairment Screen takes 4 minutes to ask 4 items and has an LR for a positive result of 33 (95% CI, 15.0-72.0) and an LR for a negative result is 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.3). Clock drawings are helpful in 1- to 3-minute forms, but must be scored appropriately and sensitivity to mild forms of impairment can be low.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should select 1 primary tool based on (1) the population receiving care; (2) an awareness of the effects of educational level, race, and age on scoring; and (3) consideration of adding 1 or 2 other tools for special situations as needed.

摘要

背景

在美国,多达500万人患有痴呆症,还有许多人有记忆方面的困扰。用于筛查认知障碍的简短测试有助于指导痴呆症的诊断。

目的

综述关于基层医疗中简短认知筛查工具的实用性和准确性的文献。

数据来源

于2000年1月至2006年4月检索MEDLINE(包括来自艾滋病在线、生物伦理在线和健康之星的数据)和心理学文摘数据库,以更新先前的综述。

研究选择

纳入对60岁及以上患者的研究以及使用可接受的标准诊断痴呆症的研究。

数据提取

由2名独立评审员评估研究的合格性和质量。第三名独立评审员裁决分歧。提取似然比(LR)数据。

数据综合

29项使用25种不同筛查工具的研究符合纳入标准;一些研究评估了几种不同的工具,因此,可以对38种独特的工具/研究组合进行信息审查。

结果

对于常用的简易精神状态检查表,阳性结果的中位数似然比为6.3(95%置信区间[CI],3.4 - 47.0),阴性结果的中位数似然比为0.19(95%CI,0.06 - 0.37)。有更简短的方法,但研究较少。 informant报告患者有记忆丧失时,痴呆症的似然比为6.5(95%CI,4.4 - 9.6)。记忆障碍筛查需要4分钟询问4个项目,阳性结果的似然比为33(95%CI,15.0 - 72.0),阴性结果的似然比为0.08(95%CI,0.02 - 0.3)。画钟测试在1至3分钟的形式下有帮助,但必须正确评分,对轻度损害形式的敏感性可能较低。

结论

临床医生应根据以下因素选择1种主要工具:(1)接受护理的人群;(2)了解教育水平、种族和年龄对评分的影响;(3)根据需要考虑为特殊情况添加1或2种其他工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验