Friedman Daniel J
Population and Public Health Information Services, USA.
Vital Health Stat 2. 2006 Jan(143):1-83.
This report assesses the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research.
This study: (1) Reviewed national strategies for electronic health records in Australia, Canada, England, and New Zealand, through written materials available before January 2006. (2) Identified the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research through interviews with 96 experts in the U.S., Australia, Canada, England, and New Zealand. (3) Delineated fundamental issues that must be confronted to maximize the contribution of national strategies for electronic health records to population health monitoring and research.
National strategies for electronic health records reflect the political, healthcare, and market systems of individual countries. National strategies also reflect technical decisions and political judgments. National strategies are evolving, and passing through stages of conceptualization, design, pilot testing, and implementation. Only England has moved to implementation. Population health monitoring and research are secondary to the primary uses of clinical care and management in all national strategies for electronic health records. Only England has conceptualized, designed, and is implementing the use of electronic health records for population health monitoring and research. Canada's strategy includes communicable disease surveillance, but not broader population health monitoring for developing health statistics. This study identifies definitional, numerator, denominator, and overarching issues that must be evaluated in assessing the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research. It delineates success factors that increase the potential for those national strategies to contribute to population health monitoring and research. Finally, this study assesses barriers that must be overcome if national strategies for electronic health records can contribute to population health monitoring and research, and especially to health statistics.
本报告评估国家电子健康记录战略在人群健康监测和研究方面的潜力。
本研究:(1) 通过2006年1月之前可获取的书面材料,回顾了澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰和新西兰的国家电子健康记录战略。(2) 通过对美国、澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰和新西兰的96位专家进行访谈,确定国家电子健康记录战略在人群健康监测和研究方面的潜力。(3) 阐述为使国家电子健康记录战略对人群健康监测和研究做出最大贡献而必须面对的基本问题。
国家电子健康记录战略反映了各个国家的政治、医疗保健和市场体系。国家战略还反映了技术决策和政治判断。国家战略正在不断发展,正经历概念化、设计、试点测试和实施阶段。只有英格兰进入了实施阶段。在所有国家电子健康记录战略中,人群健康监测和研究都从属于临床护理和管理的主要用途。只有英格兰对将电子健康记录用于人群健康监测和研究进行了概念化、设计并正在实施。加拿大的战略包括传染病监测,但不包括用于生成健康统计数据的更广泛的人群健康监测。本研究确定了在评估国家电子健康记录战略在人群健康监测和研究方面的潜力时必须评估的定义、分子、分母和总体问题。它阐述了增加这些国家战略对人群健康监测和研究做出贡献潜力的成功因素。最后,本研究评估了如果国家电子健康记录战略要对人群健康监测和研究,尤其是对健康统计数据做出贡献必须克服的障碍。