• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科急诊护理应用研究网络登记处:儿科急诊护理的多中心电子健康记录登记处。

The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry: A Multicenter Electronic Health Record Registry of Pediatric Emergency Care.

机构信息

Department of Research Informatics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States.

Department of Pediatrics and Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):366-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651496. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1651496
PMID:29791930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5966304/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record (EHR)-based registries allow for robust data to be derived directly from the patient clinical record and can provide important information about processes of care delivery and patient health outcomes.

METHODS

A data dictionary, and subsequent data model, were developed describing EHR data sources to include all processes of care within the emergency department (ED). ED visit data were deidentified and XML files were created and submitted to a central data coordinating center for inclusion in the registry. Automated data quality control occurred prior to submission through an application created for this project. Data quality reports were created for manual data quality review.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Registry, representing four hospital systems and seven EDs, demonstrates that ED data from disparate health systems and EHR vendors can be harmonized for use in a single registry with a common data model. The current PECARN Registry represents data from 2,019,461 pediatric ED visits, 894,503 distinct patients, more than 12.5 million narrative reports, and 12,469,754 laboratory tests and continues to accrue data monthly.

CONCLUSION

The Registry is a robust harmonized clinical registry that includes data from diverse patients, sites, and EHR vendors derived via data extraction, deidentification, and secure submission to a central data coordinating center. The data provided may be used for benchmarking, clinical quality improvement, and comparative effectiveness research.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录 (EHR) 登记系统允许直接从患者的临床记录中获取强大的数据,并且可以提供有关护理提供过程和患者健康结果的重要信息。

方法

制定了一个数据字典,以及随后的数据模型,用于描述包括急诊科 (ED) 内所有护理过程的 EHR 数据源。ED 就诊数据经过去标识化处理,创建了 XML 文件,并提交给中央数据协调中心,以纳入该登记系统。通过为该项目创建的应用程序,在提交之前自动进行数据质量控制。创建数据质量报告,以进行手动数据质量审查。

结果

代表四个医疗系统和七个 ED 的儿科急诊护理应用研究网络 (PECARN) 登记系统表明,来自不同医疗系统和 EHR 供应商的 ED 数据可以通过使用通用数据模型进行协调,以便在单个登记系统中使用。目前的 PECARN 登记系统代表了来自 2019461 次儿科 ED 就诊、894503 名不同患者、超过 1250 万份叙述性报告和 12469754 次实验室测试的数据,并且每月仍在不断增加数据。

结论

该登记系统是一个强大的协调临床登记系统,包括来自不同患者、地点和 EHR 供应商的数据,这些数据是通过数据提取、去标识化和安全提交到中央数据协调中心获得的。提供的数据可用于基准测试、临床质量改进和比较效果研究。

相似文献

1
The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry: A Multicenter Electronic Health Record Registry of Pediatric Emergency Care.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络登记处:儿科急诊护理的多中心电子健康记录登记处。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):366-376. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651496. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.利用电子健康记录数据快速开发专科人群登记册和质量指标*。一个敏捷框架。
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jun 14;56(99):e74-e83. doi: 10.3414/ME16-02-0031.
3
Pediatric emergency department overcrowding: electronic medical record for identification of frequent, lower acuity visitors. Can we effectively identify patients for enhanced resource utilization?儿科急诊科过度拥挤:利用电子病历识别频繁就诊的低急症患者。我们能否有效识别患者以提高资源利用效率?
J Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;36(3):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.090. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
4
Linking Electronic Health Record and Trauma Registry Data: Assessing the Value of Probabilistic Linkage.连接电子健康记录与创伤登记数据:评估概率性连接的价值。
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Nov;57(5-06):261-269. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681087. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Disseminating a Standard for Medical Records in Emergency Departments Among Different Software Vendors Using HL7 CDA.利用HL7临床文档架构(CDA)在不同软件供应商之间传播急诊科病历标准。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;243:132-136.
6
The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN): rationale, development, and first steps.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN):基本原理、发展及初步措施
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Jun;19(3):185-93. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000081245.98249.6e.
7
Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery.建立一个用于脊柱手术的整合生活质量结果的电子健康记录登记系统。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):176-85. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141127. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
8
Developing a communitywide electronic health record disease registry in primary care practices: lessons learned from the Western new york beacon community.在基层医疗实践中建立全社区电子健康记录疾病登记系统:来自纽约西部灯塔社区的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 4;2(3):1089. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1089. eCollection 2014.
9
Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.急诊医师对电子健康记录中临床决策支持的知识和态度:一项基于调查的研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):352-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12109.
10
Epidemiology of a pediatric emergency medicine research network: the PECARN Core Data Project.儿科急诊医学研究网络的流行病学:儿科急诊应用研究网络核心数据项目
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Oct;22(10):689-99. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000236830.39194.c0.

引用本文的文献

1
Opioid Timeliness in the Emergency Department and Hospitalizations for Acute Sickle Cell Pain.急诊科阿片类药物使用及时性与急性镰状细胞疼痛住院情况
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2967.
2
Integrating Global Health Concepts into Pediatric Emergency Medicine Training and Practice: A Narrative Review.将全球健康概念融入儿科急诊医学培训与实践:一项叙述性综述
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Jun 14;12:30502225251337535. doi: 10.1177/30502225251337535. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Risk of Bacterial Infections in Febrile Infants 61 to 90 Days Old With Respiratory Viruses.61至90日龄发热婴儿合并呼吸道病毒时发生细菌感染的风险
Pediatrics. 2025 Jul 1;156(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2025-070617.
4
Emergency Department Clinical Quality Registries: A Scoping Review.急诊科临床质量登记:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;13(9):1022. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091022.
5
The PICU Data Collaborative: A Novel, Multi-Institutional, Pediatric Critical Care Dataset.儿科重症监护病房数据协作组:一个全新的、多机构的儿科重症监护数据集。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 1;26(7):e941-e951. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003758. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
6
Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinator Presence and Pediatric Care Quality Measures.儿科急诊护理协调员的在场情况与儿科护理质量指标
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51111.
7
Natural Language Processing to Identify Infants Aged 90 Days and Younger With Fevers Prior to Presentation.利用自然语言处理技术识别90日龄及以下婴儿就诊前的发热情况。
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Jan 1;15(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-008051.
8
Agreement of electronic health record-documented race and ethnicity with parental report.电子健康记录中记录的种族和族裔与父母报告的一致性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;31(6):613-616. doi: 10.1111/acem.14840. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
Stratification of risk for emergent intracranial abnormalities in children with headaches: a Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) study protocol.头痛患儿紧急颅内异常风险分层:儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 22;13(11):e079040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079040.
10
Pediatric Firearm Injury Emergency Department Visits From 2017 to 2022: A Multicenter Study.2017 年至 2022 年儿科枪支伤害急诊就诊:一项多中心研究。
Pediatrics. 2023 Dec 1;152(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063129.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Antibiotic Use for Viral Illness in Emergency Departments.急诊科中病毒感染性疾病抗生素使用的种族和民族差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0203. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
2
Identification of Long Bone Fractures in Radiology Reports Using Natural Language Processing to support Healthcare Quality Improvement.利用自然语言处理技术识别放射学报告中的长骨骨折以支持医疗质量改进
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 9;7(4):1051-1068. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-08-RA-0129.
3
Harmonization of Databases: A Step for Advancing the Knowledge About Spinal Cord Injury.数据库的协调统一:推动脊髓损伤知识进步的一步。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1805-18. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Appending Limited Clinical Data to an Administrative Database for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: The Impact on the Assessment of Hospital Quality.为急性心肌梗死患者的管理数据库添加有限的临床数据:对医院质量评估的影响。
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):538-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000520.
5
A Review of the Use of Medicare Claims Data in Plastic Surgery Outcomes Research.医疗保险理赔数据在整形手术结果研究中的应用综述。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Oct 26;3(10):e530. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000497. eCollection 2015 Oct.
6
Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.为质量改进和比较效果研究准备电子临床数据:SCOAP CERTAIN自动化与验证项目
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 10;1(1):1025. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1025. eCollection 2013.
7
Agreement of Medicaid claims and electronic health records for assessing preventive care quality among adults.评估成年人预防保健质量的医疗补助索赔和电子健康记录的一致性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):720-4. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002333. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
8
Discrepancies identified with the use of prescription claims and diagnostic billing data following a comprehensive medication review.在全面药物审查后,使用处方索赔和诊断计费数据时发现的差异。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):165-73. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.2.165.
9
Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.使用操作性电子健康记录数据进行比较有效性研究的注意事项。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S30-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd.
10
Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.《健康信息技术:电子健康记录技术的标准、实施规范及认证标准,2014年版;健康信息技术永久认证计划的修订》。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 4;77(171):54163-292.