• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给他们想要的?《儿童最佳药物法案》下儿科安慰剂对照试验的可允许性。

Give them what they want? The permissibility of pediatric placebo-controlled trials under the best pharmaceuticals for children act.

作者信息

Lynch Holly Fernandez

机构信息

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, USA.

出版信息

Ann Health Law. 2007 Winter;16(1):79-138, table of contents.

PMID:17552129
Abstract

This article discusses the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act and the FDA's request for placebo-controlled studies of drugs to treat OCD and depression in children. First, the article explains the need to test drugs in children and examines the reasons this testing has not occurred. Next, the article describes the legislative and administrative responses to remedy this lack of research and assesses the ethics and legality of their implementation. The article concludes that these initiatives are legally and ethically acceptable until a safe and effective treatment is determined--at which point the use of placebos in pediatric testing must be replaced with active controls.

摘要

本文讨论了《儿童最佳药品法案》以及美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)要求对治疗儿童强迫症和抑郁症的药物进行安慰剂对照研究的情况。首先,文章解释了在儿童中测试药物的必要性,并审视了此类测试尚未开展的原因。接下来,文章描述了为弥补这一研究不足而采取的立法和行政措施,并评估了这些措施实施的伦理和法律问题。文章得出结论,在确定安全有效的治疗方法之前,这些举措在法律和伦理上是可以接受的——届时儿科测试中使用的安慰剂必须被活性对照所取代。

相似文献

1
Give them what they want? The permissibility of pediatric placebo-controlled trials under the best pharmaceuticals for children act.给他们想要的?《儿童最佳药物法案》下儿科安慰剂对照试验的可允许性。
Ann Health Law. 2007 Winter;16(1):79-138, table of contents.
2
The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002: the rise of the voluntary incentive structure and congressional refusal to require pediatric testing.2002年《儿童最佳药品法案》:自愿激励机制的兴起以及国会拒绝要求进行儿科测试。
Harvard J Legis. 2003 Winter;40(1):133-93.
3
Ethical considerations in conducting pediatric research.开展儿科研究中的伦理考量。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;205:219-44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20195-0_11.
4
The evolution of legislation to regulate pediatric clinical trials: Present and continuing challenges.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Apr 20;58(1):106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
5
Safeguarding children--pediatric research on medical countermeasures.保护儿童——儿科医学对策研究
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1171-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302093. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
6
[Pediatric drug development: ICH harmonized tripartite guideline E11 within the United States of America, the European Union, and Japan].[儿科药物研发:美国、欧盟和日本境内的国际人用药品注册技术协调会三方协调指导原则E11]
Arch Pediatr. 2014 Oct;21(10):1129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
The ethical use of placebo in clinical trials involving children.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2004 Summer;14(2):169-74. doi: 10.1089/1044546041649057.
8
The use of placebos in clinical trials: responsible research or unethical practice?临床试验中安慰剂的使用:是负责任的研究还是不道德的行为?
Conn Law Rev. 2001 Winter;33(2):449-501.
9
Current issues in clinical research and the development of new pharmaceuticals.临床研究与新型药物研发中的当前问题。
Account Res. 2001;8(4):283-91. doi: 10.1080/08989620108573981.
10
Export of pharmaceuticals and medical devices under the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act: FDA's striking change in interpretation post-Shelhigh.根据联邦《食品、药品和化妆品法案》进行的药品和医疗器械出口:谢尔希案后美国食品药品监督管理局在解释上的显著变化。
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(1):149-69.

引用本文的文献

1
When ethics constrains clinical research: trial design of control arms in "greater than minimal risk" pediatric trials.当伦理限制临床研究时:“大于最小风险”儿科试验中对照臂的试验设计。
Hum Gene Ther. 2011 Sep;22(9):1121-7. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.230. Epub 2011 May 19.