Chen Edith, Chim Louise S, Strunk Robert C, Miller Gregory E
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct 1;176(7):644-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200610-1473OC. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
Biopsychosocial models of asthma have been proposed in the literature, but few empirical tests of social factors at various levels of influence have been conducted.
To test associations of neighborhood, peer, and family factors with asthma outcomes in youth, and to determine the pathways through which these social factors operate.
Observational study of youths with asthma (n = 78).
Youths completed questionnaires about neighborhood problems, peer support, and family support. Biological (IgE, eosinophil count, production of IL-4) and behavioral (youth smoking, exposure to smoke, adherence to medications) pathways were measured. Asthma symptoms and pulmonary function were assessed in the laboratory and at home for 2 weeks. Lower levels of family support were associated with greater symptoms (beta coefficients: -0.26 to -0.33, P < 0.05) and poorer pulmonary function (beta: 0.30, P < 0.05) via biological pathways (Z statistics from 1.19 to 1.51, P < 0.05). Higher levels of neighborhood problems were associated with greater symptoms (beta coefficients: 0.27-0.33, P < 0.05) via behavioral pathways related to smoking (Z statistics = 1.40, P < 0.05). Peer support was not associated with symptoms or pulmonary function.
This study indicates that family factors may affect youths' asthma via physiologic changes, whereas community factors may help shape the health behaviors of youths with asthma.
文献中已提出哮喘的生物心理社会模型,但针对不同影响层面的社会因素进行的实证检验较少。
检验邻里、同伴和家庭因素与青少年哮喘结局之间的关联,并确定这些社会因素发挥作用的途径。
对患有哮喘的青少年(n = 78)进行观察性研究。
青少年完成了关于邻里问题、同伴支持和家庭支持的问卷调查。测量了生物学途径(免疫球蛋白E、嗜酸性粒细胞计数、白细胞介素-4的产生)和行为途径(青少年吸烟、接触烟雾、药物依从性)。在实验室和家中对哮喘症状和肺功能进行了为期2周的评估。较低水平的家庭支持通过生物学途径与更严重的症状(β系数:-0.26至-0.33,P < 0.05)和较差的肺功能(β:0.30,P < 0.05)相关(Z统计量从1.19至1.51,P < 0.05)。较高水平的邻里问题通过与吸烟相关的行为途径与更严重的症状相关(β系数:0.27 - 0.33,P < 0.05)(Z统计量 = 1.40,P < 0.05)。同伴支持与症状或肺功能无关。
本研究表明,家庭因素可能通过生理变化影响青少年的哮喘,而社区因素可能有助于塑造哮喘青少年的健康行为。