Suppr超能文献

确定痴呆症护理图谱作为一种结果测量方法和变革过程的有效性:一项试点研究。

Determining the efficacy of Dementia Care Mapping as an outcome measure and a process for change: a pilot study.

作者信息

Chenoweth Lynn, Jeon Yun-Hee

机构信息

University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2007 May;11(3):237-45. doi: 10.1080/13607860600844226.

Abstract

Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) is increasingly being promoted world-wide as a useful approach in assisting staff to improve the well-being of residents with dementia. While DCM is employed as an outcome measure of well-being and as a process to assist staff improve quality of care, it has not been subject to the rigorous scrutiny of a controlled trial to establish its efficacy as an outcome measure, or as an intervention. In 2005 the authors were awarded an Australian Health Minister's Grant to conduct a randomised control trial of DCM in 15 residential dementia care units across the city of Sydney, Australia. This paper reports on a pilot study conducted with 35 dementia care residents in three secure residential care units in the state of New South Wales, Australia, prior to the controlled trial. The main aims of the pilot were to determine the sensitivity of DCM against the validated baseline and outcome measures selected for the trial and to evaluate the utility of the research plan. The utility of the research plan was established. Whilst a significant improvement was shown in staff interactions with residents over time, there was no evidence that DCM improved the residents' quality of life and well-being in relation to physical and cognitive functioning, although there was a reduction in the residents' levels of agitation and depression. While as a research tool DCM needs further refinement to match the strength of validated outcome measures that more accurately assess the residents' well-being, DCM procedures improved staff's attention to monitoring and attending to the residents' well-being.

摘要

痴呆症护理映射(DCM)在全球范围内越来越多地被推广,作为一种帮助工作人员改善痴呆症患者福祉的有用方法。虽然DCM被用作福祉的结果指标以及协助工作人员提高护理质量的过程,但它尚未经过对照试验的严格审查,以确定其作为结果指标或干预措施的有效性。2005年,作者获得了澳大利亚卫生部长的拨款,在澳大利亚悉尼市的15个痴呆症护理住院单元中进行DCM的随机对照试验。本文报告了在对照试验之前,在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的三个安全住院护理单元中对35名痴呆症护理患者进行的一项试点研究。该试点的主要目的是确定DCM相对于为试验选择的经过验证的基线和结果指标的敏感性,并评估研究计划的实用性。研究计划的实用性得到了确立。虽然随着时间的推移,工作人员与患者的互动有了显著改善,但没有证据表明DCM在身体和认知功能方面改善了患者的生活质量和福祉,尽管患者的激动和抑郁程度有所降低。虽然作为一种研究工具,DCM需要进一步完善,以匹配更准确评估患者福祉的经过验证的结果指标的力度,但DCM程序提高了工作人员对监测和关注患者福祉的关注度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验