• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的痴呆症患者评估:现有测量方法综述

Person-centered assessment of people living with dementia: Review of existing measures.

作者信息

Mast Benjamin T, Molony Sheila L, Nicholson Nicholas, Kate Keefe Caroline, DiGasbarro Diana

机构信息

Psychological & Brain Sciences University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky USA.

Quinnipiac University School of Nursing Hamden Connecticut USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 May 25;7(1):e12138. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12138. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1002/trc2.12138
PMID:34095438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8149970/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Person-centered care and assessment calls for measurement tools that help researchers and providers understand people with dementia, their social relationships, and their experience of the care environment. This paper reviewed available measures and evaluated their psychometric properties.

METHODS

Literature searches of major databases (PsycInfo, PubMed, EBSCO, CINAHL) for papers examining person-centered constructs in samples of people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. Reliability and validity coefficients were reviewed and reported.

RESULTS

We identified 26 unique measures that had been tested in samples of people living with dementia. Twelve measures of hope, well-being, engagement, social relationships, meaning, resilience, stigma, spiritual beliefs and practices, values and preferences, and positive psychology constructs had strong psychometric properties in samples with dementia.

DISCUSSION

A variety of reliability and valid measures were identified for use in person-centered care and research with people living with dementia. Additional measure development is needed for key person-centered concepts including dignity and strengths.

摘要

引言

以患者为中心的护理与评估需要测量工具,以帮助研究人员和医护人员了解痴呆症患者、他们的社会关系以及他们在护理环境中的体验。本文回顾了现有的测量方法并评估了它们的心理测量特性。

方法

对主要数据库(PsycInfo、PubMed、EBSCO、CINAHL)进行文献检索,以查找在痴呆症患者或轻度认知障碍患者样本中研究以患者为中心的构念的论文。对信度和效度系数进行了回顾和报告。

结果

我们确定了26种在痴呆症患者样本中经过测试的独特测量方法。其中12种关于希望、幸福感、参与度、社会关系、意义、复原力、耻辱感、精神信仰与实践、价值观与偏好以及积极心理学构念的测量方法,在痴呆症患者样本中具有很强的心理测量特性。

讨论

确定了多种信度和效度良好的测量方法,可用于对痴呆症患者的以患者为中心的护理与研究。对于包括尊严和优势在内的关键以患者为中心的概念,还需要进一步开发测量方法。

相似文献

1
Person-centered assessment of people living with dementia: Review of existing measures.以患者为中心的痴呆症患者评估:现有测量方法综述
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 May 25;7(1):e12138. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12138. eCollection 2021.
2
Person-centered assessment of apathy and resistance to care in people living with dementia: Review of existing measures.痴呆症患者冷漠和护理抗拒的以患者为中心评估:现有测量方法综述
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Jul 26;8(1):e12316. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12316. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of environmental assessment tools for settings for individuals living with dementia.针对痴呆症患者生活环境的环境评估工具评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Sep 30;8(1):e12353. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12353. eCollection 2022.
4
A systematic review and psychometric evaluation of resilience measurement scales for people living with dementia and their carers.痴呆患者及其照护者的韧性测量量表的系统评价和心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01747-x.
5
The development and preliminary psychometric properties of two positive psychology outcome measures for people with dementia: the PPOM and the EID-Q.两种针对痴呆症患者的积极心理学结果测量工具的开发及初步心理测量特性:积极心理学结果测量量表(PPOM)和生活质量-痴呆症问卷(EID-Q)。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0468-6.
6
Reliability, validity and relevance of needs assessment instruments for informal dementia caregivers: a psychometric systematic review.非专业痴呆症照护者需求评估工具的信度、效度和相关性:心理测量学系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Apr;18(4):704-742. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003976.
7
Positive psychology outcome measures for family caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic review.积极心理学在痴呆症患者家庭照顾者中的结局指标:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Aug;29(8):1281-1296. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000655. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
9
Psychometric viability of measures of functional performance commonly used for people with dementia: a systematic review of measurement properties.常用于痴呆症患者的功能表现测量方法的心理测量可行性:测量属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):115-71. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003064.
10
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the CG-STYLE measure in family caregivers of individuals living with dementia.验证痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的CG-STYLE测量方法。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70492. doi: 10.1002/alz.70492.
2
A psychometric study of the Flourishing Scale for people living with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者的蓬勃发展量表的心理测量学研究。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 24;11(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70097. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
A scoping review of outcome measures for people living with dementia and family supporters to evaluate Recovery College dementia courses.一项针对痴呆症患者及其家庭支持者的结局指标的范围审查,以评估康复学院痴呆症课程。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 6;16:1591772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1591772. eCollection 2025.
4
Facility-Level Variation of Resident Loneliness in Assisted Living and Associated Organizational Context Factors: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.辅助生活中居民孤独感的机构层面差异及相关组织背景因素:一项重复横断面研究
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 May;40(5):e70093. doi: 10.1002/gps.70093.
5
Meaningful to whom? Minimal clinically important differences and the priorities of individuals living with dementia for everyday function.对谁有意义?最小临床重要差异与痴呆症患者日常功能的优先事项。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Feb 19;11(1):e70052. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70052. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
6
Two new positive psychosocial measures for persons living with dementia.针对痴呆症患者的两项新的积极社会心理测量方法。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Feb 19;11(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70024. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
7
A scoping review of dementia education programs to assess for the inclusion of culture.一项关于痴呆症教育项目的范围审查,以评估文化因素的纳入情况。
Dementia (London). 2024 Nov 20;24(6):14713012241300592. doi: 10.1177/14713012241300592.
8
Religious participation is associated with fewer dementia diagnoses among Black people in the United States.在美国,宗教参与与黑人中较少的痴呆症诊断病例相关。
Am J Hum Biol. 2024 Dec;36(12):e24125. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.24125. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
9
A Multidimensional, Person-Centered Framework for Functional Assessment in Dementia: Insights from the 'What', 'How', 'To Whom', and 'How Much' Questions.多维、以人为中心的痴呆症功能评估框架:来自“什么”、“如何”、“针对谁”和“多少”问题的见解。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(4):1187-1205. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230376.
10
Spiritual Needs of Older Adults Living with Dementia: An Integrative Review.痴呆症老年患者的精神需求:一项综合综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 4;11(9):1319. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091319.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review.测量痴呆症患者的幸福感:概念性范围综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 24;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01440-x.
2
Reconsidering frameworks of Alzheimer's dementia when assessing psychosocial outcomes.在评估心理社会结果时重新审视阿尔茨海默病性痴呆的框架。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Aug 17;5:388-397. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.02.008. eCollection 2019.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Adult Hope Scale among Nursing Home Residents with and without Cognitive Impairment.养老院中伴有和不伴有认知障碍的居民的成人希望量表的信度和效度。
Clin Gerontol. 2020 May-Jun;43(3):340-349. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2019.1656696. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Isolation Scale in Older Adults.老年人社交隔离量表的心理测量学评估
Gerontologist. 2020 Sep 15;60(7):e491-e501. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz083.
5
Exploring the bidirectional associations between loneliness and cognitive functioning over 10 years: the English longitudinal study of ageing.探究孤独感和认知功能在 10 年内的双向关联:英国老龄化纵向研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1937-1948. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz085.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia care mapping in care homes: results from the DCM™ EPIC trial process evaluation.实施痴呆症关怀映射在养老院中的障碍和促进因素:来自 DCM™ EPIC 试验过程评估的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1045-y.
7
Personalized Goal Attainment in Dementia Care: Measuring What Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers Want.个性化的痴呆症护理目标实现:测量痴呆症患者及其照护者的需求。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2120-2127. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15541. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review.成人疼痛测量中反应量表的选择:文献综述结果
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 6;2:40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6. eCollection 2017.
9
Psychometric Properties and Factor Analysis of the Engagement and Independence in Dementia Questionnaire (EID-Q).痴呆症问卷(EID-Q)中参与度和独立性的心理测量特性及因素分析
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(3-4):119-127. doi: 10.1159/000488484. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Psychometric properties of Hope Scales: A systematic review.希望量表的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Jul;72(7):e13213. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13213. Epub 2018 Jun 19.