Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):508-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.020. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
Dementia care mapping and person centred care are well-accepted as processes for improving care and well-being for persons with dementia living in the residential setting. However, the impact of dementia care mapping and person centred care on staff has not been well researched.
The impact of person centred care and dementia care mapping compared to each other and to usual dementia care on staff outcomes was examined in terms of staff burnout, general well-being, attitudes and reactions towards resident behavioural disturbances, perceived managerial support, and quality of care interactions.
A cluster-randomised, controlled trial.
The study was conducted between 2005 and 2007 in 15 residential aged care sites in the Sydney metropolitan area, Australia, with comparable management structures, staffing mix and ratios, and standards of care.
194 consenting managers, nurses, therapists and nurse assistants working in the participating sites.
Intervention care sites received training and support in either person centred care (n=5) or dementia care mapping (n=5); control sites continued with usual dementia care (n=5). Staff outcomes of those three groups were assessed before, directly after the four month intervention (post) and after a further four months (follow-up). The primary outcome measures were the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Analysis involved repeated measures analyses of variance for each of the outcome measures and adjustment for potential confounders to limit bias.
The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey results showed that change over time in emotional exhaustion scores differed between the three groups. Post-hoc analyses for each group separately revealed that the only significant time effect was in the dementia care mapping group (p=0.006), with emotional exhaustion scores declining over time. At baseline, more perceived support from management was associated with less emotional exhaustion (r(s)=0.26, p=0.004, n=122) and less depersonalisation (r(s)=0.21, p=0.023, n=122), but not for any of the other outcome measures.
This study has shown that person centred approaches of care, in particular with dementia care mapping, may contribute to reducing staff job related burnout. The findings also highlight a potentially important role of managerial support and a whole of system approach.
痴呆症护理映射和以患者为中心的护理被广泛认为是改善居住在住宅环境中的痴呆症患者护理和幸福感的过程。然而,痴呆症护理映射和以患者为中心的护理对员工的影响尚未得到充分研究。
以员工倦怠、总体幸福感、对患者行为障碍的态度和反应、感知管理支持以及护理交互质量为衡量标准,比较以患者为中心的护理和痴呆症护理映射对员工的影响。
一项集群随机对照试验。
2005 年至 2007 年期间,在澳大利亚悉尼大都市区的 15 个住宅老年护理场所进行了这项研究,这些场所具有可比的管理结构、人员组合和比例以及护理标准。
同意参与的管理人员、护士、治疗师和护士助理共 194 名。
干预护理场所接受了以患者为中心的护理(n=5)或痴呆症护理映射(n=5)的培训和支持;对照场所继续进行常规痴呆症护理(n=5)。在干预前(基线)、干预后四个月(即刻后)和进一步四个月后(随访)评估三组人员的员工结果。主要结果指标为 Maslach 倦怠量表-人类服务调查和 12 项一般健康问卷。分析涉及对每项结果测量的重复测量方差分析,并进行潜在混杂因素的调整,以限制偏倚。
Maslach 倦怠量表-人类服务调查结果表明,三组人员的情绪衰竭评分随时间的变化不同。对每组的事后分析显示,唯一显著的时间效应是在痴呆症护理映射组(p=0.006),情绪衰竭评分随时间下降。在基线时,更多来自管理层的支持与较少的情绪衰竭(r(s)=0.26,p=0.004,n=122)和较少的去人性化(r(s)=0.21,p=0.023,n=122)相关,但与其他任何结果测量均无关。
这项研究表明,以患者为中心的护理方法,特别是痴呆症护理映射,可能有助于减少员工与工作相关的倦怠。研究结果还强调了管理支持和整个系统方法的潜在重要作用。