• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丰富认知症患者机会项目:10 个额外关怀住房方案中的集群随机对照试验。

The enriched opportunities programme for people with dementia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 10 extra care housing schemes.

机构信息

Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, UK.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2011 Nov;15(8):1008-17. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.583628. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2011.583628
PMID:21702705
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Enriched Opportunities Programme (EOP) is a multi-level intervention focussing on improved quality of life for people with dementia. This study compared the experience of people living with dementia and other mental health problems in extra care housing schemes that utilised EOP with schemes that employed an active control intervention.

METHOD

Ten extra care housing schemes were cluster randomised to receive either the EOP intervention or an active control intervention for an 18-month period. Residents with dementia or other significant mental health problems (20-30 per scheme) were assessed on a number of outcome measures at baseline, six months, one year and 18 months. The primary outcome measure was quality of life. Self-reported depression was an important secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The EOP-participating residents rated their quality of life more positively over time (4.0 (SE 0.6) units; 14% p < 0.001) than the active control (1.3 (SE 0.6) units; 4% p = 0.003). There was also a significant group-time interaction for depressive symptoms (p = 0.003). The EOP-participating residents reported a reduction of 25% at both six and 12 months and a 37% reduction at 18 months (all p's < 0.001). EOP residents were less likely than residents in the active control sites to move to a care home or to be admitted to a hospital inpatient bed. They were more likely to be seen by a range of community health professionals.

CONCLUSION

The EOP had a positive impact on the quality of life of people with dementia in well-staffed extra care housing schemes.

摘要

目的

丰富机会计划(EOP)是一项多层次干预措施,专注于提高痴呆症患者的生活质量。本研究比较了在利用 EOP 的额外护理住房计划中生活的痴呆症患者和其他精神健康问题患者的体验,以及在采用积极对照干预的计划中的体验。

方法

10 个额外护理住房计划被整群随机分配接受 EOP 干预或积极对照干预,为期 18 个月。在基线、6 个月、1 年和 18 个月时,对每个计划中 20-30 名患有痴呆症或其他严重精神健康问题的居民进行多项结果评估。主要结果评估是生活质量。自我报告的抑郁是一个重要的次要结果。

结果

EOP 参与的居民随着时间的推移对生活质量的评价更为积极(4.0(SE 0.6)单位;14%p < 0.001),而积极对照(1.3(SE 0.6)单位;4%p = 0.003)。抑郁症状也存在显著的组间时间交互作用(p = 0.003)。EOP 参与的居民在 6 个月和 12 个月时分别报告减少了 25%,在 18 个月时减少了 37%(所有 p 值均 < 0.001)。与积极对照组相比,EOP 组的居民搬到护理院或住院的可能性较小。他们更有可能接受一系列社区卫生专业人员的治疗。

结论

在人员配备充足的额外护理住房计划中,EOP 对痴呆症患者的生活质量产生了积极影响。

相似文献

1
The enriched opportunities programme for people with dementia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 10 extra care housing schemes.丰富认知症患者机会项目:10 个额外关怀住房方案中的集群随机对照试验。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Nov;15(8):1008-17. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.583628. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
2
A cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce the unmet needs of people with dementia living in residential care.一项旨在减少居住在养老院的痴呆症患者未满足需求的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;22(11):1127-34. doi: 10.1002/gps.1801.
3
Evaluation of a MS specialist nurse programme.对一名多发性硬化症专科护士项目的评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Nov;43(8):985-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.019. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
4
Does functionally based activity make a difference to health status and mobility? A randomised controlled trial in residential care facilities (The Promoting Independent Living Study; PILS).基于功能的活动对健康状况和行动能力有影响吗?一项在寄宿护理机构进行的随机对照试验(促进独立生活研究;PILS)。
Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):57-63. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm135. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
5
Providing activity for people with dementia in care homes: a cluster randomised controlled trial.在养老院为痴呆症患者提供活动:一项集群随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;28(12):1296-304. doi: 10.1002/gps.3960. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
Helping carers to care--the 10/66 dementia research group's randomized control trial of a caregiver intervention in Russia.帮助照料者进行照料——10/66 痴呆症研究小组在俄罗斯开展的照料者干预措施的随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;24(4):347-54. doi: 10.1002/gps.2126.
7
Special care facility compared with traditional environments for dementia care: a longitudinal study of quality of life.与传统痴呆症护理环境相比的特殊护理设施:一项关于生活质量的纵向研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1085-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52304.x.
8
Determining the efficacy of Dementia Care Mapping as an outcome measure and a process for change: a pilot study.确定痴呆症护理图谱作为一种结果测量方法和变革过程的有效性:一项试点研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2007 May;11(3):237-45. doi: 10.1080/13607860600844226.
9
The effects of group living homes on older people with dementia: a comparison with traditional nursing home care.群居养老院对老年痴呆症患者的影响:与传统养老院护理的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(9):970-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2205.
10
The effect of staff training on the use of restraint in dementia: a single-blind randomised controlled trial.员工培训对痴呆症患者约束使用情况的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;20(6):587-90. doi: 10.1002/gps.1329.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of the benefits and challenges of different models of extra care housing for residents living with dementia.一项关于不同模式的额外关怀住房对患有痴呆症的居民的益处和挑战的定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2024 Aug;23(6):981-1000. doi: 10.1177/14713012241249794. Epub 2024 May 3.
2
Non-pharmacological Approaches to Apathy and Depression: A Scoping Review of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.针对淡漠和抑郁的非药物治疗方法:轻度认知障碍和痴呆的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 16;13:815913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815913. eCollection 2022.
3
Known in the nursing home: development and evaluation of a digital person-centered artistic photo-activity intervention to promote social interaction between residents with dementia, and their formal and informal carers.
在养老院中广为人知的是:一项数字化、以患者为中心的艺术摄影活动干预措施的开发和评估,该措施旨在促进痴呆症患者与其正式和非正式照顾者之间的社交互动。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 6;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02632-w.
4
Toward Optimal Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Insights From a COVID-19 Pandemic Experience.迈向痴呆症行为和心理症状的优化管理:来自COVID-19大流行经历的见解。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 5;12:634398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.634398. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of person-centered care at the organisational-level for people with dementia. A systematic review.以组织层面为中心的护理对痴呆症患者的影响。系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212686. eCollection 2019.
6
Evidence-based Non-pharmacologic Interventions for Managing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Mental Health Issues in Residents in Assisted Living.基于证据的非药物干预措施,用于管理辅助生活设施中居民的神经精神症状和心理健康问题。
Seniors Hous Care J. 2017;25(1):71-83.
7
Person-centered care in Norwegian nursing homes and its relation to organizational factors and staff characteristics: a cross-sectional survey.挪威养老院的以患者为中心的护理及其与组织因素和员工特征的关系:一项横断面调查。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Sep;30(9):1279-1290. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002708. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
8
Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.以患者为中心的护理对痴呆症患者的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Feb 17;12:381-397. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117637. eCollection 2017.
9
Comprehensive treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies.路易体痴呆的综合治疗
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 May 29;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0128-z. eCollection 2015.