Miltenberger R G, Suda K T, Lennox D B, Lindeman D P
Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105.
Am J Ment Retard. 1991 Nov;96(3):291-8.
Individuals with mild to moderate mental retardation living in community residential settings (Experiment 1) or an institutional setting (Experiment 2) rated the acceptability of differential reinforcement and time-out applied to a mild and a severe behavior problem. Using analogue methodology similar to previous treatment acceptability studies (e.g., Miltenberger, Lennox, & Erfanian, 1989; Tarnowski, Rasnake, Mulicke, & Kelly, 1989), and a simplified rating scale developed for persons with mental retardation, community-based subjects rated differential reinforcement as more acceptable than time-out for the mild problem, whereas institutionalized subjects rated time-out as more acceptable than differential reinforcement when applied to the severe problem. These results were discussed and future research suggested.
生活在社区住宅环境(实验1)或机构环境(实验2)中的轻度至中度智力障碍者,对应用于轻度和重度行为问题的差别强化和暂停的可接受性进行了评分。采用与以往治疗可接受性研究类似的模拟方法(例如,米尔滕贝格尔、伦诺克斯和埃尔法尼安,1989年;塔尔诺夫斯基、拉斯内克、穆利克和凯利,1989年),以及为智力障碍者开发的简化评分量表,社区受试者认为差别强化对轻度问题比暂停更可接受,而机构化受试者则认为在应用于重度问题时,暂停比差别强化更可接受。对这些结果进行了讨论并提出了未来的研究建议。