Wynne-Jones Gwenllian, Dunn Kate M, Main Chris J
Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Eur J Pain. 2008 Feb;12(2):180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
The cost of low back pain (LBP) to employers is high, with an estimated pound 9090 million lost in the United Kingdom in 1998. Economic analysis of LBP has focused on work absence among the employed. There is little research characterising individuals who report reduced duties or who are not in employment because of LBP.
To compare the health related characteristics of primary care LBP consulters reporting usual employment, reduced duties, sick leave and non-employment as a result of LBP.
Prospective cohort study recruiting LBP consulters aged 30-59 years of age from five general practices in North Staffordshire.
Nine hundred and thirty-five participants completed the baseline phase, 65% were in employment and 35% were not in employment. Of the employed participants over 1 in 10 (11%) were undertaking reduced duties and almost one-fifth were reporting sick leave (22%). Furthermore, 37% of non-employed consulters reported that LBP was the reason for non-employment. Significant differences at baseline in socioeconomic status, self-rated health, anxiety, depression and disability were found between those undertaking their usual job, those on reduced duties and those on sickness absence due to LBP, with those participants further removed from the work force reporting worse health across all measures. Significant differences were also found in self-rated health between those not working due to LBP and those not working for other reasons, with participants not working due to LBP reporting worse self-rated health. At follow-up, work status was found to be relatively stable.
These findings indicate that the economic impact of LBP may be higher than previously estimated when data on reduced duties is combined with work absence. The additional impact of unemployment due to LBP should also be included in future assessments of the impact of LBP on the workforce.
腰痛给雇主带来的成本高昂,1998年英国估计损失90.9亿英镑。腰痛的经济分析主要集中在就业人员的缺勤情况。关于报告职责减少或因腰痛而未就业的个体特征的研究较少。
比较因腰痛而报告正常就业、职责减少、病假和未就业的初级保健腰痛咨询者的健康相关特征。
前瞻性队列研究,从北斯塔福德郡的五个全科诊所招募30 - 59岁的腰痛咨询者。
935名参与者完成了基线阶段,65%就业,35%未就业。在就业参与者中,超过十分之一(11%)的人职责减少,近五分之一(22%)的人报告请了病假。此外,37%的未就业咨询者表示腰痛是未就业的原因。在社会经济地位、自评健康、焦虑、抑郁和残疾方面,从事正常工作的人、职责减少的人和因腰痛请病假的人在基线时存在显著差异,与劳动力脱离程度越高的参与者在所有指标上的健康状况越差。因腰痛未工作的人和因其他原因未工作的人在自评健康方面也存在显著差异,因腰痛未工作的参与者自评健康状况更差。在随访时,工作状态相对稳定。
这些发现表明,当将职责减少的数据与缺勤数据相结合时,腰痛的经济影响可能高于先前的估计。因腰痛导致的失业的额外影响也应纳入未来对腰痛对劳动力影响的评估中。