Baldrick Paul, Reeve Lesley
Scientific and Regulatory Consulting, Covance Laboratories Ltd., England, HG3 1PY, United Kingdom.
Toxicol Pathol. 2007 Jun;35(4):562-9. doi: 10.1080/01926230701347330.
Current regulatory thinking allows for the use of single control groups for rodent carcinogenicity testing although there has been a trend until recently to use dual control groups. To date, virtually nothing has been published on whether a shift from dual to single control groups will affect the identification of tumorigenic risk potential in these studies. A recent evaluation of dual control carcinogenicity data in the rat (Baldrick, Toxicol Pathol 2005, 33: 283-291) showed that although no major differences in tumor incidences between the control groups were found, some interstudy variation occurred and in cases were a notable difference was seen, the use of 2 control groups, as well as robust, contemporary background data, allowed an easier interpretation of findings in drug-treated groups. In this paper, the results of 10 mouse carcinogenicity studies, performed between 1991 and 2004, with 2 control groups, are presented. As in the rat, interstudy variation was seen and in some cases, the use of dual control groups assisted in the tumor risk assessment. Thus, the continued use of 2 control groups can have a vital role in mouse carcinogenicity studies. The paper also presents an update on survival, on the range and extent of background spontaneous neoplasms and comments on genetic drift in this commonly used mouse strain.
目前的监管思路允许在啮齿类动物致癌性试验中使用单对照组,尽管直到最近一直存在使用双对照组的趋势。迄今为止,几乎没有关于从双对照组转变为单对照组是否会影响这些研究中致瘤风险潜力识别的文献发表。最近一项对大鼠双对照组致癌性数据的评估(Baldrick,《毒理病理学》2005年,33卷:283 - 291页)表明,虽然对照组之间的肿瘤发生率未发现重大差异,但存在一些研究间的变异,并且在出现显著差异的情况下,使用2个对照组以及可靠的当代背景数据,有助于更轻松地解释药物治疗组的结果。本文展示了1991年至2004年间进行的10项使用双对照组的小鼠致癌性研究的结果。与大鼠研究一样,观察到了研究间的变异,并且在某些情况下,使用双对照组有助于肿瘤风险评估。因此,持续使用2个对照组在小鼠致癌性研究中可发挥重要作用。本文还介绍了生存率的最新情况、背景自发性肿瘤的范围和程度,并对这种常用小鼠品系中的遗传漂变进行了评论。