Suppr超能文献

一种用于测量健康受试者静息能量消耗(REE)的新设备。

A new device for measuring resting energy expenditure (REE) in healthy subjects.

作者信息

Malavolti Marcella, Pietrobelli Angelo, Dugoni Manfredo, Poli Marco, Romagnoli Elisa, De Cristofaro Paolo, Battistini Nino C

机构信息

Applied Dietetic Technical Sciences, Modena and Reggio Emilia University, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Jun;17(5):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lifestyle change targeted towards increasing daily resting energy expenditure (REE) is one of the cornerstones of obesity treatment. Measurements of energy expenditure and substrate utilization are essential to understanding the metabolic basis of obesity, and the physiological responses to perturbations in habitual food intake. REE is the largest part of human energy expenditure (60-70%) and an increase or decrease in REE would have a large impact on total energy. Accurate and easy-to-use methods for measuring REE are needed, to be applied by clinicians in daily clinical settings to assess the validity of a new instrument to estimate REE in normal weight, healthy adults.

METHODS

Ninety-nine subjects (52 females and 47 males) (mean+/-SD, age 38+/-14 years; body mass index (BMI) 23+/-3 kg/m(2)) were tested. REE was assessed using a Sensor Medics Vmax metabolic cart with a ventilated canopy and with the SenseWear armband. Body composition, percentage fat mass (%FM) and percentage fat free mass (%FFM) were assessed by skinfold thickness measurements (SF), bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) and air displacement plethysmography (BOD-POD).

RESULTS

No significant difference was found among measurements of FFM using the three different techniques. Both SenseWear and Sensor Medics Vmax showed a high correlation, r=0.42 and r=0.40 (p<0.0001) respectively, with BMI. No significant difference was found in mean REE between SenseWear (1540+/-280 kcal/day) and Sensor Medics Vmax (1700+/-330 kcal/day) (p=ns) and the correlation between REE measured by SenseWear and Sensor Medics Vmax was high (r=0.86, p<0.0001). Bland-Altman plot showed no difference in REE determination between SenseWear and Sensor Medics Vmax. %FFM determined by BOD-POD correlated with SenseWear (r=0.42, p<0.0001) as well as Sensor Medics Vmax (r=0.38, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

SF, BIA and BOD-POD provide valid and reliable measurements of FFM. Our results suggest that the SenseWear armband is an acceptable device to accurately measure REE in healthy subjects. Its characteristics have the potential to reduce measurement times and make the SenseWear armband useful for epidemiological studies.

摘要

背景与目的

旨在增加每日静息能量消耗(REE)的生活方式改变是肥胖治疗的基石之一。能量消耗和底物利用的测量对于理解肥胖的代谢基础以及对习惯性食物摄入量扰动的生理反应至关重要。REE是人体能量消耗的最大组成部分(60 - 70%),REE的增加或减少会对总能量产生重大影响。需要准确且易于使用的测量REE的方法,以便临床医生在日常临床环境中应用,以评估一种用于估计正常体重健康成年人REE的新仪器的有效性。

方法

对99名受试者(52名女性和47名男性)(平均±标准差,年龄38±14岁;体重指数(BMI)23±3 kg/m²)进行了测试。使用带有通风面罩的Sensor Medics Vmax代谢车和SenseWear臂带评估REE。通过皮褶厚度测量(SF)、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和空气置换体积描记法(BOD - POD)评估身体成分、脂肪质量百分比(%FM)和去脂体重百分比(%FFM)。

结果

使用三种不同技术测量FFM时未发现显著差异。SenseWear和Sensor Medics Vmax与BMI均显示出高度相关性,分别为r = 0.42和r = 0.40(p < 0.0001)。SenseWear(1540±280千卡/天)和Sensor Medics Vmax(1700±330千卡/天)之间的平均REE未发现显著差异(p =无显著性差异),且SenseWear和Sensor Medics Vmax测量的REE之间的相关性很高(r = 0.86,p < 0.0001)。Bland - Altman图显示SenseWear和Sensor Medics Vmax在REE测定方面无差异。BOD - POD测定的%FFM与SenseWear(r = 0.42,p < 0.0001)以及Sensor Medics Vmax(r = 0.38,p < 0.001)相关。

结论

SF、BIA和BOD - POD提供了有效且可靠的FFM测量。我们的结果表明,SenseWear臂带是一种可接受的设备,能够准确测量健康受试者的REE。其特性有可能缩短测量时间,使SenseWear臂带对流行病学研究有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验