Mitra Biswadev, Gocentas Robert, O'Reilly Gerard, Cameron Peter A, Atkin Chistopher
The Alfred Emergency & Trauma Centre, and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Jun;19(3):269-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00965.x.
Australasian trauma centres receive relatively low numbers of penetrating injuries from stabbings. There is limited agreement regarding protocols to guide the management of haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injuries. This has resulted in a wide variation in practice with anecdotally high negative laparotomy rates. The aim of the present study was to review the ED procedures, investigations and disposition of this group of patients.
A retrospective review of all patients presenting with abdominal penetrating injury was undertaken over a 5 year period. Data on demographics, presenting features and management were collected.
There were 109 patients who were haemodynamically stable (systolic blood pressure > 90) on arrival to the trauma centre. Diagnostic ED procedures and investigations consisted of wound exploration in 47 (43.1%) patients, focused abdominal sonography in trauma in 44 (40.4%) patients and a CT abdomen in 36 (33.0%) of patients. The sensitivity for focused abdominal sonography in trauma and CT when used together was 77.8%. There were 39 laparotomies performed with a negative laparotomy rate of 23.1%. There were 10 laparoscopies performed, none went on to require a laparotomy. Patients undergoing negative laparotomies spent significantly longer times in hospital than patients managed conservatively or those undergoing laparoscopies.
The number of penetrating abdominal injuries remains low. Imaging alone cannot reliably exclude intraperitoneal injury. A greater utilization of ED wound exploration and laparoscopy based on agreed guidelines could improve management. An algorithm for the management of these patients is suggested.
澳大利亚的创伤中心接收的刺伤所致穿透伤患者数量相对较少。对于指导血流动力学稳定的穿透伤患者管理的方案,目前达成的共识有限。这导致了实践中的广泛差异,据传闻阴性剖腹率很高。本研究的目的是回顾这组患者在急诊科的诊疗程序、检查及处置情况。
对5年间所有腹部穿透伤患者进行回顾性研究。收集患者的人口统计学资料、临床表现及治疗情况。
109例患者到达创伤中心时血流动力学稳定(收缩压>90)。急诊科的诊断性诊疗程序及检查包括:47例(43.1%)患者进行了伤口探查,44例(40.4%)患者进行了创伤重点腹部超声检查,36例(33.0%)患者进行了腹部CT检查。创伤重点腹部超声检查和CT联合使用时的敏感度为77.8%。共进行了39例剖腹手术,阴性剖腹率为23.1%。进行了10例腹腔镜手术,无一例需要转为剖腹手术。接受阴性剖腹手术的患者住院时间明显长于保守治疗或接受腹腔镜手术的患者。
腹部穿透伤的病例数仍然较少。仅靠影像学检查不能可靠地排除腹腔内损伤。基于商定的指南,更多地利用急诊科伤口探查和腹腔镜检查可能会改善治疗效果。本文提出了针对这些患者的治疗流程。