Suppr超能文献

痴呆躁动患者的活动记录仪监测。治疗效果监测。

Actigraphy in agitated patients with dementia. Monitoring treatment outcomes.

作者信息

Mahlberg R, Walther S

机构信息

Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik der Charité im St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Turmstrasse 21, 10559 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):178-84. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0420-z.

Abstract

Especially in pharmacotherapeutic research, a variety of methods to monitor behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are currently being discussed. To date, the most frequently used of these are clinical scales, which, however, are subjective and highly dependent on personnel resources. In our study, we tested the usefulness of actigraphy as a more direct and objective way to measure day-night rhythm disturbances and agitated behaviour. After a baseline assessment, 24 patients with probable dementia of the Alzheimer type (NINCDS-ADRDA) and agitated behaviour received either 3 mg melatonin (n=7), 2.5 mg dronabinol (n=7), or placebo (n=10) for two weeks. In addition, 10 young and 10 elderly healthy subjects were examined as a control group. Motor activity levels were assessed using an actigraph worn continuously on the wrist of the non-dominant hand. At the beginning and the end of the study, patients' Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores were also assessed. In the verum group, actigraphic nocturnal activity (P=0.001), NPI total score (P=0.043), and NPI agitation subscale score (P=0.032) showed significant reductions compared to baseline. The treatment-baseline ratio of nocturnal activity (P=0.021) and treatment-baseline difference of the nocturnal portion of 24 h activity (P=0.012) were reduced. Patients' baseline activity levels were similar to those seen in healthy elderly subjects. Younger healthy subjects exhibited higher motor activity even at night. There was no correlation between actigraphy and NPI. Both actigraphic measures and the gold standard clinical scale were able to distinguish between the verum and placebo groups. However, because they did not correlate with each other, they clearly represent different aspects of BPSD, each of which reacts differently to therapy. As a result, actigraphy may well come to play an important role in monitoring treatment success in BPSD.

摘要

尤其是在药物治疗研究中,目前正在讨论各种监测痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的方法。迄今为止,其中最常用的是临床量表,然而,这些量表具有主观性且高度依赖人力资源。在我们的研究中,我们测试了活动记录仪作为一种更直接、客观的方法来测量昼夜节律紊乱和激越行为的有效性。经过基线评估后,24名可能患有阿尔茨海默病型痴呆(NINCDS-ADRDA)且有激越行为的患者接受了为期两周的3毫克褪黑素(n = 7)、2.5毫克屈大麻酚(n = 7)或安慰剂(n = 10)治疗。此外,作为对照组,对10名年轻和10名老年健康受试者进行了检查。使用佩戴在非优势手手腕上的活动记录仪评估运动活动水平。在研究开始和结束时,还评估了患者的神经精神科问卷(NPI)得分。在治疗组中,与基线相比,活动记录仪记录的夜间活动(P = 0.001)、NPI总分(P = 0.043)和NPI激越分量表得分(P = 0.032)均显著降低。夜间活动的治疗-基线比值(P = 0.021)和24小时活动夜间部分的治疗-基线差异(P = 0.012)降低。患者的基线活动水平与健康老年受试者相似。即使在夜间,年轻健康受试者的运动活动也更高。活动记录仪与NPI之间没有相关性。活动记录仪测量和金标准临床量表都能够区分治疗组和安慰剂组。然而,由于它们彼此不相关,它们显然代表了BPSD的不同方面,每个方面对治疗的反应都不同。因此,活动记录仪很可能在监测BPSD的治疗效果方面发挥重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验