• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

税收激励政策转变后私人医疗保险需求的变化。

Changes in the demand for private medical insurance following a shift in tax incentives.

作者信息

Rodríguez Marisol, Stoyanova Alexandrina

机构信息

Centre de Recerca en Economía del Benestar (CREB), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2008 Feb;17(2):185-202. doi: 10.1002/hec.1248.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1248
PMID:17565735
Abstract

The 1998 Spanish reform of the Personal Income Tax eliminated the 15% deduction for private medical expenditures including payments on private health insurance (PHI) policies. To avoid an undesired increase in the demand for publicly funded health care, tax incentives to buy PHI were not completely removed but basically shifted from individual to group employer-paid policies. In a unique fiscal experiment, at the same time that the tax relief for individually purchased policies was abolished, the government provided for tax allowances on policies taken out through employment. Using a bivariate probit model on data from National Health Surveys, we estimate the impact of said reform on the demand for PHI and the changes occurred within it. Our findings indicate that the total probability of buying PHI was not significantly affected by the reform. Indeed, the fall in the demand for individual policies (by 10% between 1997 and 2001) was offset by an increase in the demand for group employer-paid ones. We also briefly discuss the welfare effects on the state budget, the industry and society at large.

摘要

1998年西班牙个人所得税改革取消了对包括私人医疗保险(PHI)保单支付在内的私人医疗支出的15%扣除。为避免公共资助医疗保健需求意外增加,购买PHI的税收激励措施并未完全取消,而是基本上从个人转向了雇主支付的团体保单。在一项独特的财政试验中,在取消对个人购买保单的税收减免的同时,政府为通过就业购买的保单提供了税收津贴。利用基于国民健康调查数据的双变量概率模型,我们估计了上述改革对PHI需求的影响以及其中发生的变化。我们的研究结果表明,购买PHI的总概率并未受到改革的显著影响。事实上,个人保单需求的下降(1997年至2001年间下降了10%)被雇主支付的团体保单需求的增加所抵消。我们还简要讨论了对国家预算、保险行业和整个社会的福利影响。

相似文献

1
Changes in the demand for private medical insurance following a shift in tax incentives.税收激励政策转变后私人医疗保险需求的变化。
Health Econ. 2008 Feb;17(2):185-202. doi: 10.1002/hec.1248.
2
National health insurance reform in South Africa: estimating the implications for demand for private health insurance.南非国家医疗保险改革:私人医疗保险需求影响的估计。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 May 1;10(3):189-200. doi: 10.2165/11594830-000000000-00000.
3
Are tax subsidies for private medical insurance self-financing? Evidence from a microsimulation model.私人医疗保险的税收补贴是否能实现自我融资?微观模拟模型的证据。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1285-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Tax incentives and the demand for private health insurance.税收激励与私人健康保险需求
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34:121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Demand for private health insurance in Chinese urban areas.中国城市地区对私人医疗保险的需求。
Health Econ. 2007 Oct;16(10):1041-50. doi: 10.1002/hec.1206.
6
[What characterizes companies that buy private health insurance?].购买私人健康保险的公司有哪些特点?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Oct 18;127(20):2673-5.
7
Health reform through tax reform: a primer.通过税收改革实现医疗改革:入门指南。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):622-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.622.
8
Inequalities in health care utilization in Spain due to double insurance coverage: An Oaxaca-Ransom decomposition.西班牙因双重保险覆盖导致的医疗保健利用不平等:奥瓦卡-兰塞姆分解法
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(5):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.037. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
9
The demand for private health care under national health insurance: the case of the self-employed.国家医疗保险下的私人医疗保健需求:个体经营者的情况。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Dec;7(4):265-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0366-x.
10
The effect of private health insurance on medical care utilization and self-assessed health in Germany.私人医疗保险对德国医疗保健利用和自我评估健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2010 Sep;19(9):1048-62. doi: 10.1002/hec.1642.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Knowledge and Private Health Insurance: Does Age Matter?金融知识与私人医疗保险:年龄有影响吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 14;11(20):2738. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202738.
2
Assisted reproduction in Spain, outcome and socioeconomic determinants of access.西班牙的辅助生殖技术、结局及获得途径的社会经济学决定因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 6;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01438-x.
3
Main Determinants of Supplementary Health Insurance Demand: (Case of Iran).补充健康保险需求的主要决定因素:(伊朗案例)
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 23;7(6):285-94. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p285.
4
Assessing barriers to health insurance and threats to equity in comparative perspective: the Health Insurance Access Database.评估健康保险障碍和比较视角下的公平威胁:健康保险获取数据库。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 10;12:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-107.
5
Does employment-based private health insurance increase the use of covered health care services? A matching estimator approach.基于就业的私人医疗保险会增加涵盖的医疗服务的使用吗?一种匹配估计方法。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Mar;12(1):1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9104-3. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
6
Voluntary private health insurance among the over 50s in Europe.欧洲 50 岁以上人群的自愿私人健康保险。
Health Econ. 2013 Mar;22(3):289-315. doi: 10.1002/hec.2800. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
[Private medical insurance].[私人医疗保险]
Aten Primaria. 2011 Sep;43(9):457-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
[The "glass ceiling" of Spanish primary care].[西班牙初级医疗保健中的“玻璃天花板”]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Oct;41(10):572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.12.009. Epub 2009 May 8.