Barlow James, Singh Debbie, Bayer Steffen, Curry Richard
Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(4):172-9. doi: 10.1258/135763307780908058.
We have conducted a systematic review of home telecare for frail elderly people and for patients with chronic conditions. We searched 17 electronic databases, the reference lists of identified studies, conference proceedings and Websites for studies available in January 2006. We identified summaries of 8666 studies, which were assessed independently for relevance by two reviewers. Randomized controlled trials of any size and observational studies with 80 or more participants were eligible for inclusion if they examined the effects of using telecommunications technology to (a) monitor vital signs or safety and security in the home, or (b) provide information and support. The review included 68 randomized controlled trials (69%) and 30 observational studies with 80 or more participants (31%). Most studies focused on people with diabetes (31%) or heart failure (29%). Almost two-thirds (64%) of the studies originated in the US; more than half (55%) had been published within the previous three years. Based on the evidence reviewed, the most effective telecare interventions appear to be automated vital signs monitoring (for reducing health service use) and telephone follow-up by nurses (for improving clinical indicators and reducing health service use). The cost-effectiveness of these interventions was less certain. There is insufficient evidence about the effects of home safety and security alert systems. It is important to note that just because there is insufficient evidence about some interventions, this does not mean that those interventions have no effect.
我们对针对体弱老年人和慢性病患者的居家远程护理进行了系统综述。我们检索了17个电子数据库、已识别研究的参考文献列表、会议论文集以及2006年1月可获取研究的网站。我们识别出8666项研究的摘要,由两名评审员独立评估其相关性。任何规模的随机对照试验以及参与者达80人或以上的观察性研究,若考察了使用电信技术来(a)监测家中生命体征或安全保障,或(b)提供信息与支持的效果,则有资格纳入。该综述纳入了68项随机对照试验(69%)和30项参与者达80人或以上的观察性研究(31%)。大多数研究聚焦于糖尿病患者(31%)或心力衰竭患者(29%)。几乎三分之二(64%)的研究源自美国;超过半数(55%)是在过去三年内发表的。基于所综述的证据,最有效的远程护理干预措施似乎是自动生命体征监测(用于减少医疗服务使用)和护士电话随访(用于改善临床指标并减少医疗服务使用)。这些干预措施的成本效益不太确定。关于家庭安全警报系统的效果,证据不足。需要注意的是,仅仅因为关于某些干预措施的证据不足,并不意味着那些干预措施没有效果。