De Houwer Jan, De Bruycker Els
Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):401-21. doi: 10.1348/014466606X130346.
We used both the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as implicit measures of inter-individual differences in attitudes towards political parties (Experiment 1), food items (Experiment 2) and homosexuality (Experiment 3). IAT but not EAST scores were related in a meaningful manner to self-report measures of the corresponding attitudes (Experiments 1-3) and self-reported behaviour (Experiments 2 and 3). Whereas split-half reliability of the IAT scores was satisfactory, EAST scores overall had a low split-half reliability. The present results suggest that the EAST as introduced by De Houwer (2003b, Experimental Psychology) does not offer a good alternative for the IAT as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.
我们使用外在情感西蒙任务(EAST)和内隐联想测验(IAT)作为对政党态度(实验1)、食品项目(实验2)和同性恋态度(实验3)个体间差异的内隐测量方法。IAT分数而非EAST分数与相应态度的自我报告测量(实验1 - 3)以及自我报告行为(实验2和3)存在有意义的关联。虽然IAT分数的分半信度令人满意,但EAST分数总体上分半信度较低。目前的结果表明,德休尔(2003b,《实验心理学》)引入的EAST作为一种内隐测量个体间态度差异的方法,并非IAT的良好替代方案。