Suppr超能文献

作为一种衡量个体态度间差异的内隐测量方法,内隐联想测验比外在情感西蒙任务表现更优。

The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.

作者信息

De Houwer Jan, De Bruycker Els

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):401-21. doi: 10.1348/014466606X130346.

Abstract

We used both the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as implicit measures of inter-individual differences in attitudes towards political parties (Experiment 1), food items (Experiment 2) and homosexuality (Experiment 3). IAT but not EAST scores were related in a meaningful manner to self-report measures of the corresponding attitudes (Experiments 1-3) and self-reported behaviour (Experiments 2 and 3). Whereas split-half reliability of the IAT scores was satisfactory, EAST scores overall had a low split-half reliability. The present results suggest that the EAST as introduced by De Houwer (2003b, Experimental Psychology) does not offer a good alternative for the IAT as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.

摘要

我们使用外在情感西蒙任务(EAST)和内隐联想测验(IAT)作为对政党态度(实验1)、食品项目(实验2)和同性恋态度(实验3)个体间差异的内隐测量方法。IAT分数而非EAST分数与相应态度的自我报告测量(实验1 - 3)以及自我报告行为(实验2和3)存在有意义的关联。虽然IAT分数的分半信度令人满意,但EAST分数总体上分半信度较低。目前的结果表明,德休尔(2003b,《实验心理学》)引入的EAST作为一种内隐测量个体间态度差异的方法,并非IAT的良好替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验