Rogers M Brooke, Loewenthal Kate M, Lewis Christopher Alan, Amlôt Richard, Cinnirella Marco, Ansari Humayan
King's College London, UK.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;19(3):253-62. doi: 10.1080/09540260701349399.
This paper examines the social-psychological factors often implicated in discussions of terrorist violence/martyrdom, with a particular focus on the role of religion. We offer a brief description of the psychological theories underpinning terrorist research before focusing on social-psychological factors. The roles of psychopathology, irrationality and grievance/threat are examined, followed by empirical research on the beliefs which have been associated with the perpetration and support of terrorist violence, and the social factors which foster those beliefs, including social identity, socially carried interpretations, group leadership and individual differences. Although religion is not a single, simple causal factor in terrorist violence, religious elements often feature strongly in the belief systems associated with terrorist violence, and can also feature in other important fostering factors for terrorist violence, such as the use of rhetoric. Finally, the status of lay explanations of terrorist violence, focusing on the role of religious fundamentalism is examined.
本文探讨了在恐怖主义暴力/殉难讨论中经常涉及的社会心理因素,特别关注宗教的作用。在关注社会心理因素之前,我们简要描述了支撑恐怖主义研究的心理学理论。研究了精神病理学、非理性以及不满/威胁的作用,随后是关于与恐怖主义暴力的实施和支持相关的信念的实证研究,以及促成这些信念的社会因素,包括社会认同、社会传播的解读、群体领导和个体差异。尽管宗教不是恐怖主义暴力的单一、简单的因果因素,但宗教元素在与恐怖主义暴力相关的信仰体系中往往占据重要地位,并且也可能出现在恐怖主义暴力的其他重要促成因素中,比如言辞的运用。最后,考察了关于恐怖主义暴力的通俗解释的状况,重点关注宗教原教旨主义的作用。