Kavanagh Christopher M, Kapitány Rohan, Putra Idhamsyah Eka, Whitehouse Harvey
Centre for the Study of Social Cohesion, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 3;11:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01172. eCollection 2020.
A growing body of evidence suggests that two distinct forms of group alignment are possible: identification and fusion (the former asserts that group and personal identity are distinct, while the latter asserts group and personal identities are functionally equivalent and mutually reinforcing). Among highly fused individuals, group identity taps directly into personal agency and so any attack on the group is perceived as a personal attack and motivates a willingness to fight and possibly even die as a defensive response. As such, identity fusion is relevant in explaining violent extremism, including suicidal terrorist attacks. Identity fusion is theorized to arise as a result from experiences which are (1) perceived as shared and (2) transformative, however evidence for this relationship remains limited. Here, we present a pre-registered study in which we examine the role of transformativeness and perceived sharedness of group-defining events in generating identity fusion. We find that both of these factors are predictive of identity fusion but that the relationship with transformativeness was more consistent than perceived sharedness across analyses in a sample of Indonesian Muslims.
越来越多的证据表明,群体认同有两种不同的形式:认同和融合(前者认为群体认同和个人认同是不同的,而后者认为群体认同和个人认同在功能上是等效的且相互强化)。在高度融合的个体中,群体认同直接影响个人能动性,因此对群体的任何攻击都被视为个人攻击,并激发战斗甚至可能牺牲的意愿作为防御反应。因此,认同融合与解释暴力极端主义有关,包括自杀式恐怖袭击。理论上,认同融合是由(1)被视为共享的和(2)变革性的经历所导致的,然而这种关系的证据仍然有限。在这里,我们展示了一项预先注册的研究,其中我们研究了群体定义事件的变革性和感知共享性在产生认同融合中的作用。我们发现这两个因素都能预测认同融合,但在印度尼西亚穆斯林样本的分析中,与变革性的关系比感知共享性更一致。