• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在年度支付限额的情况下,共付额对药物使用的影响。

Effect of copayments on drug use in the presence of annual payment limits.

作者信息

Kephart George, Skedgel Chris, Sketris Ingrid, Grootendorst Paul, Hoar John

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):328-34.

PMID:17567233
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that deductibles (copayment combined with annual limits on out-of-pocket payments) may reduce the effect of copayments on drug use for patients who expect to reach the annual limit, using as a natural experiment the introduction of copayments with an annual maximum to the seniors' drug plan in Nova Scotia.

STUDY DESIGN

An interrupted time-series design estimated effects of the introduction of and subsequent increase in drug copayments on the use (vs nonuse) of medications and on the mean daily quantity of use among users by patients' likelihood of exceeding the annual maximum copayment. Effects on the use of less essential medications (histamine(2)-receptor antagonists) and more essential medications (oral antihyperglycemic agents) were examined. methods: Data were drug claims for beneficiaries 65 years and older from April 1, 1989, through September 30, 1992. Regression models (applied to person-month data) estimated effects of the policies on the use and quantity of medication use.

RESULTS

Copayments ($3 per prescription and 20% of the prescription cost) were associated with reductions in the quantity of medication use, ranging from 5% to 15%, but only when the annual maximum copayment was unlikely to be reached. Introducing a 20% copayment increased the percentage who reached the annual maximum, decreasing the proportion of patients who reduced their drug use.

CONCLUSION

Although copayment policies are associated with reductions in the use of essential and less essential medications, annual limits on total copayments paid will limit copayment effects to patients who are unlikely to reach the annual maximum copayment.

摘要

目的

检验如下假设,即免赔额(自付费用与年度自付费用上限相结合)可能会降低自付费用对预计达到年度上限的患者药物使用的影响,以新斯科舍省老年人药物计划引入年度最高自付费用作为一项自然实验。

研究设计

一项中断时间序列设计,根据患者超过年度最高自付费用的可能性,估计引入药物自付费用及随后提高自付费用对药物使用(与未使用相对)以及使用者平均每日使用量的影响。研究了对使用必要性较低的药物(组胺2受体拮抗剂)和使用必要性较高的药物(口服降糖药)的影响。方法:数据为1989年4月1日至1992年9月30日65岁及以上受益人的药物报销申请。回归模型(应用于个人月度数据)估计了这些政策对药物使用和用量的影响。

结果

自付费用(每张处方3加元及处方费用的20%)与药物使用量减少相关,减少幅度为5%至15%,但仅在不太可能达到年度最高自付费用时如此。引入20%的自付费用会增加达到年度最高费用的百分比,从而降低减少药物使用的患者比例。

结论

虽然自付费用政策与使用必要性较高和较低的药物减少相关,但支付的总自付费用年度上限会将自付费用的影响限制在不太可能达到年度最高自付费用的患者身上。

相似文献

1
Effect of copayments on drug use in the presence of annual payment limits.在存在年度支付限额的情况下,共付额对药物使用的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):328-34.
2
Consumer response to dual incentives under multitiered prescription drug formularies.消费者对多层级处方药处方集下双重激励措施的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):353-9.
3
Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia.增加药物自付费用对退伍军人精神分裂症患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):335-46.
4
Copayments for medications after June 30, 2010. Final rule.2010年6月30日之后药品的自付费用。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Feb 22;76(35):9646-8.
5
Effect of increased copayments on pharmacy use in the Department of Veterans Affairs.增加自付费用对退伍军人事务部药房使用情况的影响。
Med Care. 2007 Nov;45(11):1090-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180ca95be.
6
Impact of two sequential drug cost-sharing policies on the use of inhaled medications in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.两项连续的药品费用分担政策对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘患者吸入药物使用的影响。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jun;28(6):964-78; discussion 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.007.
7
Adherence to statin therapy under drug cost sharing in patients with and without acute myocardial infarction: a population-based natural experiment.有和没有急性心肌梗死的患者在药物费用分担情况下他汀类药物治疗的依从性:一项基于人群的自然实验。
Circulation. 2007 Apr 24;115(16):2128-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.665992. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
8
Assessing the effect of Taiwan's outpatient prescription drug copayment policy in the elderly.评估台湾门诊处方药共付政策对老年人的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1331-42. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100579.91550.C4.
9
Payment restrictions for prescription drugs under Medicaid. Effects on therapy, cost, and equity.医疗补助计划下处方药的支付限制。对治疗、成本和公平性的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 27;317(9):550-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708273170906.
10
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal Pharmacare and Contraceptive Dispensations Among Youth.青少年中的全民医保与避孕药具发放
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2585.
2
Quality of Antiepileptic Treatment Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries With Epilepsy: A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.老年医疗保险癫痫患者的抗癫痫治疗质量:一项回顾性索赔数据分析
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):677-683. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000724.
3
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
4
Assessing barriers to health insurance and threats to equity in comparative perspective: the Health Insurance Access Database.评估健康保险障碍和比较视角下的公平威胁:健康保险获取数据库。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 10;12:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-107.
5
Coping strategies used by patients infected with hepatitis C virus who are facing medication costs.面临药物费用的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者所采用的应对策略。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2011 Mar;64(2):131-40. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v64i2.997.
6
How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.患者费用分担趋势如何影响依从性和治疗结果:一项文献综述。
P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55.