• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常用品牌处方药的处方集层级定位:基准分析与首选定位指数的创建

Formulary tier placement for commonly prescribed branded drugs: benchmarking and creation of a preferred placement index.

作者信息

Mullins C Daniel, Palumbo Francis B, Saba Mojdeh

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):377-84.

PMID:17567239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relative preferred placement of commonly dispensed prescription drugs and to assess variations in drug coverage across a convenience sample of 12 health insurance plans.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional analysis of the plans focused on all 67 patented brand-name prescription drugs from among the top 200 prescribed drugs in 2004.

METHODS

For each plan, we created a preferred placement index representing the percentages of drugs that were positioned on the formulary with preferred placement, defined as tier 2 without restricted access. A separate cardiovascular index was also created. Sensitivity analyses determined the effect of limiting the sample to the top 25 patented branded drugs and examined the robustness of our index when prior authorization restrictions were allowed.

RESULTS

Across 67 drugs and 12 insurance plans, drugs were rated as having preferred placement 59.1% of the time. The preferred placement index ranged from 31.3% to 88.1% across the plans for the full sample of 67 drugs; for the sample of cardiovascular drugs, the range was 25.0% to 100.0%. Results were robust across sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this convenience sample of 12 formularies, there is a wide variation in preferred placement of the most commonly prescribed branded medicines across insurers. The wide range implies that the specific insurance coverage a patient selects may have an effect on whether his or her prescribed drugs have preferred formulary placement and on his or her out-of-pocket drug expenditures.

摘要

目的

研究常用处方药的相对优先放置情况,并评估12种医疗保险计划便利样本中药物覆盖范围的差异。

研究设计

对这些计划进行横断面分析,重点关注2004年处方量排名前200的所有67种专利品牌处方药。

方法

对于每个计划,我们创建了一个优先放置指数,该指数代表放置在处方集上具有优先放置资格的药物百分比,优先放置定义为无限制使用的二级。还创建了一个单独的心血管指数。敏感性分析确定了将样本限制在前25种专利品牌药物的影响,并在允许事先授权限制的情况下检查了我们指数的稳健性。

结果

在67种药物和12种保险计划中,药物被评为具有优先放置资格的时间占59.1%。在67种药物的完整样本中,各计划的优先放置指数范围为31.3%至88.1%;对于心血管药物样本,范围为25.0%至100.0%。敏感性分析的结果很稳健。

结论

基于这12种处方集的便利样本,各保险公司最常用的品牌药物的优先放置情况存在很大差异。这种广泛的差异意味着患者选择的特定保险覆盖范围可能会影响其处方药是否具有优先处方集放置资格以及其自付药物费用。

相似文献

1
Formulary tier placement for commonly prescribed branded drugs: benchmarking and creation of a preferred placement index.常用品牌处方药的处方集层级定位:基准分析与首选定位指数的创建
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):377-84.
2
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
3
Do drug formulary policies reflect evidence of value?药品处方集政策是否反映了价值证据?
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jan;12(1):30-6.
4
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.基于激励措施的药品处方集对处方药使用及支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
5
Relationship between generic and preferred-brand prescription copayment differentials and generic fill rate.普通品牌与首选品牌处方药共付差异与普通药品填充率之间的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):347-52.
6
Impact of patient and plan design factors on switching to preferred statin therapy.患者及方案设计因素对改用首选他汀类药物治疗的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;41(12):1946-53. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K253. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
7
Consumer attitudes and factors related to prescription switching decisions in multitier copayment drug benefit plans.多层共付药品福利计划中消费者态度及与处方转换决策相关的因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Mar;10(3):201-8.
8
Three-tiered-copayment drug coverage and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.三层自付费用药物覆盖范围与非甾体抗炎药的使用
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1679-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1679.
9
Controlling prescription drug expenditures: a report of success.控制处方药支出:一份成功报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Aug;13(8):473-80.
10
Access to cancer drugs in Medicare Part D: formulary placement and beneficiary cost sharing in 2006.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):1240-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1240.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prescription for Drug Formulary Evaluation: An Application of Price Indexes.药品处方集评估的一个方法:价格指数的应用
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2012 Mar 30;15(2). doi: 10.1515/1558-9544.1296.
2
Impact of pharmacy benefit design on prescription drug utilization: a fixed effects analysis of plan sponsor data.药学福利设计对处方药使用的影响:对计划赞助商数据的固定效应分析
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):988-1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00943.x. Epub 2009 Jan 28.