• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钆布醇心肌灌注成像:3特斯拉与1.5特斯拉采用相同序列设计的比较。

Myocardial perfusion imaging with Gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 and 1.5 Tesla with an identical sequence design.

作者信息

Theisen Daniel, Wintersperger Bernd J, Huber Armin, Dietrich Olaf, Reiser Maximilian F, Schönberg Stefan O

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):499-506. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180339981.

DOI:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180339981
PMID:17568272
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To implement myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging at 3 Tesla and to evaluate the potential benefit with regard to signal parameters in comparison to 1.5 Tesla using identical sequence settings and an intraindividual comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 16 volunteers, myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging was performed at 1.5 Tesla (Magnetom Avanto) and 3 Tesla (Magnetom TIM Trio) after injection of 0.05 mmol/kg body weight Gadobutrol using an accelerated saturation recovery TurboFLASH technique (GRAPPA; R=2) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Detailed sequence parameters (TR 2.3 milliseconds, TE 0.93 milliseconds, flip angle 15 degrees , bandwidth 780 Hz/px) as well as spatial resolution were kept identical for both field strengths. Artifacts were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast enhancement ratio (CER) were calculated from raw data signal intensity-time curves. A linear fit on the upslope was performed for semiquantitative perfusion analysis.

RESULTS

SNR was significantly higher at 3 Tesla than at 1.5 Tesla (35.7+/-11.9 vs. 18.0+/-5.5, P<0.001). CER was significantly greater at 3 Tesla than at 1.5 Tesla (2.2+/-0.9 vs. 1.4+/-0.5, P<0.001). Maximum upslope was significantly higher at 3 Tesla than at 1.5 Tesla (3.3+/-2.4 vs. 2.0+/-1.0, P<0.001). A qualitative examination of all images for artifacts by 2 board-certified radiologists yielded no significant differences between the field strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Three Tesla significantly improves CER and SNR compared with 1.5 Tesla with identical sequence parameters. In addition, the most important semiquantitative perfusion parameter maximum upslope is significantly increased. This may allow for an improvement of spatial resolution and potentially for a better delineation of perfusion defects. However, further studies are necessary to potentially demonstrate a benefit of 3 Tesla perfusion imaging in a clinical setting.

摘要

目的

在3特斯拉场强下实施心肌首过灌注成像,并在相同序列设置及个体内比较的情况下,评估相较于1.5特斯拉场强,其在信号参数方面的潜在优势。

材料与方法

对16名志愿者,在注射0.05 mmol/kg体重的钆布醇后,分别于1.5特斯拉(Magnetom Avanto)和3特斯拉(Magnetom TIM Trio)场强下,采用加速饱和恢复快速小角度激发技术(GRAPPA;R = 2)进行心肌首过灌注成像。两种场强下均保持详细的序列参数(重复时间2.3毫秒,回波时间0.93毫秒,翻转角15度,带宽780赫兹/像素)以及空间分辨率相同。对伪影进行定量和定性评估,从原始数据信号强度 - 时间曲线计算信噪比(SNR)和对比增强率(CER)。对上坡段进行线性拟合以进行半定量灌注分析。

结果

3特斯拉场强下的SNR显著高于1.5特斯拉场强(35.7±11.9 vs. 18.0±5.5,P<0.001)。3特斯拉场强下的CER显著大于1.5特斯拉场强(2.2±0.9 vs. 1.4±0.5,P<0.001)。3特斯拉场强下的最大上坡段显著高于1.5特斯拉场强(3.3±2.4 vs. 2.0±1.0,P<0.001)。两位经过委员会认证的放射科医生对所有图像的伪影进行定性检查,结果显示场强之间无显著差异。

结论

与1.5特斯拉场强相比,在相同序列参数下,3特斯拉场强显著提高了CER和SNR。此外,最重要的半定量灌注参数最大上坡段也显著增加。这可能有助于提高空间分辨率,并有可能更好地描绘灌注缺损。然而,需要进一步的研究来潜在地证明3特斯拉灌注成像在临床环境中的优势。

相似文献

1
Myocardial perfusion imaging with Gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 and 1.5 Tesla with an identical sequence design.钆布醇心肌灌注成像:3特斯拉与1.5特斯拉采用相同序列设计的比较。
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):499-506. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180339981.
2
Myocardial first pass perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: impact of parallel imaging algorithms on image quality and signal behavior.钆布醇心肌首过灌注成像:并行成像算法对图像质量和信号行为的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):522-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180383572.
3
First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla.3特斯拉下的首次通过心肌灌注心血管磁共振成像
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):633-44. doi: 10.1080/10976640601093661.
4
Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.使用3.0特斯拉延迟增强磁共振成像评估心肌活力。
Invest Radiol. 2006 Sep;41(9):661-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000233321.82194.09.
5
Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla.3.0特斯拉并行采集的对比增强首次通过心肌灌注磁共振成像
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):352-60. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000262566.89636.3f.
6
Comparison of three accelerated pulse sequences for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE).使用结合时间滤波的灵敏度编码(TSENSE)对三种加速脉冲序列进行半定量心肌灌注成像的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):569-79. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21047.
7
Intraindividual comparison of MR-renal perfusion imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):406-11. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000262561.47892.b8.
8
Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences.多层首次通过心肌灌注成像:饱和恢复(SR)-真稳态自由进动(TrueFISP)-二维(2D)与SR-快速小角度激发(TurboFLASH)-2D脉冲序列的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 May;19(5):555-63. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20050.
9
Multislice MR first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of the receiver coil array.多层磁共振首次通过心肌灌注成像:接收线圈阵列的影响
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Mar;21(3):310-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20264.
10
Dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography: is saturation recovery TrueFISP advantageous over saturation recovery TurboFLASH?动态磁共振肾造影:饱和恢复TrueFISP序列相较于饱和恢复TurboFLASH序列是否具有优势?
Invest Radiol. 2007 Apr;42(4):256-62. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000255810.78648.eb.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac MR perfusion imaging: where we are.心脏磁共振灌注成像:我们目前的进展
Radiol Med. 2015 Feb;120(2):190-205. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0435-7. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
2
Inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion reserve quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla in comparison to quantitative coronary angiography.在 3T 场强下心血管磁共振心肌灌注储备定量分析与定量冠状动脉造影的观察者间一致性和诊断准确性比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Mar 27;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-25.
3
MRI and CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: indications and applications.
MRI和CT在冠状动脉疾病诊断中的应用:适应证与应用
Insights Imaging. 2011 Feb;2(1):9-24. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0049-0. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
4
[MRI for therapy control in patients with aortic isthmus stenosis].[用于主动脉峡部狭窄患者治疗控制的磁共振成像]
Radiologe. 2011 Jan;51(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-1997-6.
5
High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.3T 下使用 1M 对比剂的高分辨率心肌磁共振负荷灌注成像。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1580-6. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T.3.0T场强下k空间与时间敏感性编码加速心肌灌注磁共振成像:与1.5T场强的比较
Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):493-500. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492080017.
7
Cardiac magnetic resonance at high field: promises and problems.高场强心脏磁共振成像:前景与问题
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;37(2):49-56. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.11.003.