Suppr超能文献

门诊食管-心前区房颤电复律:恢复窦性心律的有效且安全的技术

Outpatient oesophageal-precordial electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an effective and safe technique to restore sinus rhythm.

作者信息

Santini Luca, Magris Barbara, Topa Alessia, Gallagher Mark M, Forleo Giovanni B, Papavasileiou Lida P, Borzi Mauro, Romeo Francesco, Santini Massimo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Jul;8(7):488-93. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000278440.74117.fe.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

External electrical cardioversion is commonly used in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), but usually involves general anaesthesia. We tested the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a minimally invasive cardioversion technique, not requiring general anaesthesia, performed on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

We performed outpatient oesophageal cardioversion in 87 consecutive patients (mean age: 67.5 +/- 9.6 years; weight: 77.47 +/- 12.34 kg; left atrium diameter: 46.25 +/- 6.85 mm; LVEF: 55.5 +/- 16%) with persistent AF (mean duration: 6.99 +/- 11.55 months). A biphasic shock was delivered via an oesophageal decapolar lead (cathode) and two precordial patches (anode) under a mild sedation (midazolam 2.5-5 mg). In the first 25 patients, a step-up protocol (from 10 to 100 J) was performed whereas, in the other 62, a first shock at 50 J and a second one at 100 J, were delivered.

RESULTS

Patients described the level of discomfort caused by the procedure according a five-grade scale. Cardioversion was achieved in 97.7% of patients using a mean effective energy of 51.2 +/- 15.7 J. In 88.5% of patients, sinus rhythm was restored by using 50 J or less. No complications occurred and no patient required hospital admission. Mean discomfort score was 1.56 +/- 0.74 out of 5. Sinus rhythm persisted in 62.6% of patients at the 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient oesophageal cardioversion is a safe, acceptable and effective way to cardiovert patients with AF. It may be a useful alternative to external cardioversion. A relatively high starting energy (50 J) was demonstrated to be superior to a low-energy step-up technique.

摘要

目的

体外电复律常用于心房颤动(AF)的治疗,但通常需要全身麻醉。我们测试了一种微创复律技术的疗效、安全性和耐受性,该技术无需全身麻醉,可在门诊进行。

方法

我们对87例持续性AF患者(平均年龄:67.5±9.6岁;体重:77.47±12.34 kg;左心房直径:46.25±6.85 mm;左心室射血分数:55.5±16%)进行了门诊食管复律(平均病程:6.99±11.55个月)。在轻度镇静(咪达唑仑2.5 - 5 mg)下,通过食管十极导联(阴极)和两个胸前贴片(阳极)给予双相电击。在前25例患者中,采用递增方案(从10 J到100 J),而在其他62例患者中,首次电击能量为50 J,第二次为100 J。

结果

患者根据五级量表描述了该操作引起的不适程度。97.7%的患者使用平均有效能量51.2±15.7 J实现了复律。88.5%的患者使用50 J或更低能量恢复了窦性心律。未发生并发症,无需患者住院。平均不适评分为1.56±0.74(满分5分)。1个月随访时,62.6%的患者窦性心律持续存在。

结论

门诊食管复律是一种安全、可接受且有效的AF患者复律方法。它可能是体外复律的一种有用替代方法。相对较高的起始能量(50 J)被证明优于低能量递增技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验