• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对七个欧洲国家基因诊所提供的与基因检测相关的患者书面信息的评估。

An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries.

作者信息

Lewis Celine, Mehta Pritti, Kent Alastair, Skirton Heather, Coviello Domenico

机构信息

Genetic Interest Group, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;15(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874
PMID:17568389
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of written information for patients and families about genetic testing, from a range of European countries. Written information relating to genetic testing for five conditions was gathered from genetic departments across seven European countries. Written information for each condition from each country was randomly chosen for assessment. Fourteen key issues had been identified by a number of pre-existing tools (in particular the DISCERN-Genetics tool) as being important for inclusion when developing or assessing material relating to genetic testing. Fifty pieces in total were assessed for the inclusion or omission of key issues. Although the majority of information discussed issues relating to the condition including background and effect (n=48, 96%), treatment and management (n=37, 74%) and heredity and risk (n=49, 98%), only half the information discussed where to obtain additional information and support (n=25, 50%). Less than half the information discussed what happens after the test (n=15, 30%), patient rights (n=12, 24%) and shared decision making (n=12, 24). Benefits were more likely to be included (n=41, 82%) than any risks involved (n=24, 48%). The issue discussed least frequently was the possible psychological and social effects of genetic testing (n=9, 18%). Pre-written leaflets tended to provide a more comprehensive discussion of the issues surrounding genetic testing than personal letters did and should therefore routinely be available to patients alongside personal letters. Written information should include risks and limitations of testing as well as discussion of the psychological and social aspects of genetic testing.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估来自一系列欧洲国家的、面向患者及家属的基因检测书面信息的质量。我们从七个欧洲国家的基因科室收集了与五种疾病的基因检测相关的书面信息。每个国家针对每种疾病的书面信息都随机选取进行评估。一些已有的工具(特别是DISCERN - Genetics工具)确定了14个关键问题,这些问题在开发或评估与基因检测相关的材料时非常重要,需要纳入考量。总共评估了50份材料,以确定关键问题的包含或遗漏情况。虽然大多数信息都讨论了与疾病相关的问题,包括背景和影响(n = 48,96%)、治疗和管理(n = 37,74%)以及遗传和风险(n = 49,98%),但只有一半的信息讨论了从何处获取更多信息和支持(n = 25,50%)。不到一半的信息讨论了检测后会发生什么(n = 15,30%)、患者权利(n = 12,24%)和共同决策(n = 12,24%)。与任何相关风险(n = 24,48%)相比,益处更有可能被提及(n = 41,82%)。讨论最少的问题是基因检测可能产生的心理和社会影响(n = 9,18%)。预先编写的宣传册往往比私人信件更全面地讨论了基因检测相关问题,因此应该与私人信件一起常规性地提供给患者。书面信息应包括检测的风险和局限性,以及对基因检测心理和社会方面的讨论。

相似文献

1
An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries.对七个欧洲国家基因诊所提供的与基因检测相关的患者书面信息的评估。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;15(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
2
A survey of the quality of information leaflets on hayfever available from general practices and community pharmacies.一项关于从全科医疗诊所和社区药房获取的花粉热信息传单质量的调查。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Sep;34(9):1438-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02055.x.
3
Family genetics.家族遗传学
Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Oct;36(10):802-5.
4
Genetic information and testing in insurance and employment: technical, social and ethical issues.保险与就业中的遗传信息及检测:技术、社会与伦理问题
Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec;11 Suppl 2:S123-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201117.
5
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
6
An evaluation of the quality of commercially produced patient information leaflets.
Br Dent J. 2006 Jul 22;201(2):114-7; discussion 100. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813846.
7
Providing written information on HIV testing improves patient knowledge but does not affect test uptake.提供有关艾滋病毒检测的书面信息可提高患者的认知,但不会影响检测接受率。
Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Mar;17(3):185-8. doi: 10.1258/095646206775809303.
8
DISCERN-Genetics: quality criteria for information on genetic testing.DISCERN-遗传学:基因检测信息的质量标准。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;14(11):1179-88. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201701. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
9
Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.基因检测及相关咨询服务评估:当前研究与未来方向
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(7):1427-42. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00337-X.
10
A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis.一种用于评估书面患者信息质量的语言框架:其在评估类风湿关节炎甲氨蝶呤信息中的应用。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Jun;20(3):334-44. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg123. Epub 2004 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing.有哪些适合父母的信息呢?一项关于产前微阵列和外显子组测序的在线信息的系统评价。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jan;42(1):97-108. doi: 10.1002/pd.6066. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
2
Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.制定患者友好型遗传和基因组检测报告:促进患者参与和理解的格式。
Genome Med. 2014 Jul 31;6(7):58. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0058-6. eCollection 2014.
3
From constraints to opportunities? Provision of psychosocial support in portuguese oncogenetic counseling services.
从限制到机遇?葡萄牙肿瘤遗传咨询服务中的心理社会支持提供
J Genet Couns. 2013 Dec;22(6):771-83. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9612-4. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
4
Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.呈现囊性纤维化患者的生活:一种基于Q方法开发平衡的、基于经验的产前筛查信息的途径。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1349-62. doi: 10.1111/hex.12113. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
5
An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.一个关于癌症遗传学的数字故事在线资源:患者偏好与信息需求的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e78. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1735.
6
A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.从耳语游戏的角度探讨 DNA 检测结果的家庭沟通:BRCA1/2 检测结果在患者与亲属之间沟通过程的回顾性研究。
Fam Cancer. 2011 Mar;10(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y.
7
Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.心理健康领域的共同决策:个性化医疗的前景。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(4):455-63. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.4/redrake.
8
EuroGentest patient information leaflets: a free resource available in over 20 languages.欧洲基因检测患者信息手册:一种提供20多种语言的免费资源。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;17(6):732. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.20. Epub 2009 Mar 4.