Lewis Celine, Mehta Pritti, Kent Alastair, Skirton Heather, Coviello Domenico
Genetic Interest Group, London, UK.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;15(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
The aim of this study was to assess the quality of written information for patients and families about genetic testing, from a range of European countries. Written information relating to genetic testing for five conditions was gathered from genetic departments across seven European countries. Written information for each condition from each country was randomly chosen for assessment. Fourteen key issues had been identified by a number of pre-existing tools (in particular the DISCERN-Genetics tool) as being important for inclusion when developing or assessing material relating to genetic testing. Fifty pieces in total were assessed for the inclusion or omission of key issues. Although the majority of information discussed issues relating to the condition including background and effect (n=48, 96%), treatment and management (n=37, 74%) and heredity and risk (n=49, 98%), only half the information discussed where to obtain additional information and support (n=25, 50%). Less than half the information discussed what happens after the test (n=15, 30%), patient rights (n=12, 24%) and shared decision making (n=12, 24). Benefits were more likely to be included (n=41, 82%) than any risks involved (n=24, 48%). The issue discussed least frequently was the possible psychological and social effects of genetic testing (n=9, 18%). Pre-written leaflets tended to provide a more comprehensive discussion of the issues surrounding genetic testing than personal letters did and should therefore routinely be available to patients alongside personal letters. Written information should include risks and limitations of testing as well as discussion of the psychological and social aspects of genetic testing.
本研究的目的是评估来自一系列欧洲国家的、面向患者及家属的基因检测书面信息的质量。我们从七个欧洲国家的基因科室收集了与五种疾病的基因检测相关的书面信息。每个国家针对每种疾病的书面信息都随机选取进行评估。一些已有的工具(特别是DISCERN - Genetics工具)确定了14个关键问题,这些问题在开发或评估与基因检测相关的材料时非常重要,需要纳入考量。总共评估了50份材料,以确定关键问题的包含或遗漏情况。虽然大多数信息都讨论了与疾病相关的问题,包括背景和影响(n = 48,96%)、治疗和管理(n = 37,74%)以及遗传和风险(n = 49,98%),但只有一半的信息讨论了从何处获取更多信息和支持(n = 25,50%)。不到一半的信息讨论了检测后会发生什么(n = 15,30%)、患者权利(n = 12,24%)和共同决策(n = 12,24%)。与任何相关风险(n = 24,48%)相比,益处更有可能被提及(n = 41,82%)。讨论最少的问题是基因检测可能产生的心理和社会影响(n = 9,18%)。预先编写的宣传册往往比私人信件更全面地讨论了基因检测相关问题,因此应该与私人信件一起常规性地提供给患者。书面信息应包括检测的风险和局限性,以及对基因检测心理和社会方面的讨论。