Cademartiri F, Palumbo A, Maffei E, La Grutta L, Runza G, Pugliese F, Midiri M, Mollet N R A, Meijboom W B, Menozzi A, Vignali L, Reverberi C, Ardissino D, Krestin G P
Dipartimento di Radiologia e Dipartimento Cuore, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Viale Rustici 2, I-43100 Parma, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2007 Jun;112(4):526-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-007-0159-z. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography (64-CT) coronary angiography in the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis.
Ninety-five patients (72 men and 23 women, mean age 58+/-8 years) with previous percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and suspected restenosis underwent 64-CT (Sensation 64, Siemens). The mean time between stent deployment and 64-CT was 6.1+/-4.2 months. The scan parameters were: slices 32 x 2, individual detector width 0.6 mm, rotation time 0.33 s, feed 3.84 mm/rotation, 120 kV, 900 mAs. After the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, Iomeron, Bracco) and a bolus chaser (40 ml of saline), the scan was completed in <12 s. All coronary segments with a stent were assessed on 64-CT by two observers in consensus and judged as: patent, with intimal hyperplasia (lumen reduction of <50%), with in-stent restenosis (> or =50%), or with in-stent occlusion (100%). The consensus reading was compared with conventional coronary angiography.
Four patients were excluded because of insufficient image quality. In the remaining 91, we assessed 102 stents (31 RCA; 10 LM; 54 LAD; 7 CX). In 14 (13.7%) stents, in-stent restenosis (n=8) or in-stent occlusion (n=6) was found. Intimal hyperplasia was detected in 11 (10.8%) stents. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of 64-CT for in-stent occlusion were 100% and 100%, respectively, whereas for all stenoses, >50% they were 92.9% and 98.7%, respectively.
We found that 64-CT has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of in-stent restenosis in a selected patient population.
本研究旨在评估64层计算机断层扫描(64-CT)冠状动脉造影检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。
95例(72例男性和23例女性,平均年龄58±8岁)曾接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并植入支架且疑似再狭窄的患者接受了64-CT检查(Sensation 64,西门子公司)。支架置入与64-CT检查之间的平均时间为6.1±4.2个月。扫描参数为:32×2层,单个探测器宽度0.6mm,旋转时间0.33s,进床速度3.84mm/旋转,120kV,900mAs。静脉注射碘化造影剂(碘普罗胺400mgI/ml,Iomeron,博莱科公司)及推注生理盐水(40ml)后,在12秒内完成扫描。两名观察者对64-CT上所有带支架的冠状动脉节段进行一致评估,并判断为:通畅、内膜增生(管腔狭窄<50%)、支架内再狭窄(≥50%)或支架内闭塞(100%)。将一致读片结果与传统冠状动脉造影进行比较。
4例患者因图像质量欠佳被排除。在其余91例患者中,我们评估了102个支架(31个右冠状动脉;10个左主干;54个左前降支;7个回旋支)。在14个(13.7%)支架中发现了支架内再狭窄(n=8)或支架内闭塞(n=6)。在11个(10.8%)支架中检测到内膜增生。64-CT对支架内闭塞的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为100%和100%,而对于所有狭窄>50%的情况,其敏感性和阴性预测值分别为92.9%和98.7%。
我们发现64-CT对特定患者群体中支架内再狭窄的检测具有较高的诊断准确性。