• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Carotid artery stenosis].

作者信息

Ringleb P A, Hacke W

机构信息

Neurologische Universitätsklinik, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2007 Jul;78(7):593-4, 596-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1360-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-007-1360-2
PMID:17569017
Abstract

Since 2004, several large randomized trials have provided important data about the comparison of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting of more than 2,000 patients with predominantly symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. None of these trials demonstrated clearly an equivalent periprocedural risk of both techniques. Long-term evaluation is also pending. Thus carotid endarterectomy remains the gold standard in treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The frequently performed endovascular treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not supported by study data.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Carotid artery stenosis].
Chirurg. 2007 Jul;78(7):593-4, 596-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1360-2.
2
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
3
[Stenting of internal carotid arteries].[颈内动脉支架置入术]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2005;105(3):72-7.
4
Alert for increased long-term follow-up after carotid artery stenting: results of a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术后长期随访增加的警示:颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性、随机、单中心试验结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.049. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
High rate of restenosis after carotid artery stenting in patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Medium-term follow-up.重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率高。中期随访。
J Neurol. 2008 Sep;255(9):1309-14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0875-x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
6
The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,在症状出现后 7 天内接受治疗的患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的风险最大。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):619-626.e2; discussion 625-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.107. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy.比较颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术长期疗效的随机对照试验的Meta分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S99-108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001933.
8
Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉狭窄患者血管成形术或支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的血管内治疗:一项随机试验的长期随访
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):898-907. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70228-5. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
9
Carotid artery stenting may be losing the battle against carotid endarterectomy for the management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, but the jury is still out.在有症状的颈动脉狭窄治疗方面,颈动脉支架置入术可能正在输给颈动脉内膜切除术,但尚无定论。
Vascular. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):183-9. doi: 10.2310/6670.2009.00039.
10
Carotid endarterectomy and treatment options for carotid occlusive disease.颈动脉内膜切除术及颈动脉闭塞性疾病的治疗选择。
World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6 Suppl):S35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.037.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical and surgical management of symptomatic carotid stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄的药物及手术治疗
Int J Stroke. 2006 Aug;1(3):140-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2006.00047.x.
2
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.
3
30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
有症状患者支架置入术式血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术对比的SPACE试验30天结果:一项随机非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1239-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69122-8.
4
Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗的安全性和有效性:Cochrane对随机证据的系统评价
Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):905-11. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000158921.51037.64. Epub 2005 Mar 3.
5
Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS).颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉血管成形术、支架置入术或动脉内膜切除术后的再狭窄。
Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):281-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
6
Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase.颈动脉支架置入术与八旬老人并发症增加相关:CREST导入期的30天卒中及死亡率
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022.
7
Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.在未使用保护装置的情况下,对颈动脉狭窄进行手术治疗与血管内治疗后,颅内微栓塞病变在数量、大小和位置上的差异。
J Neurol. 2004 Oct;251(10):1198-203. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0502-4.
8
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127.
9
Pro-CAS: a prospective registry of carotid angioplasty and stenting.Pro-CAS:一项颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的前瞻性注册研究。
Stroke. 2004 Sep;35(9):2134-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000135763.62131.6a. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
10
International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.国际颈动脉支架置入术研究:一项比较有症状颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的随机临床试验方案。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(1):69-74. doi: 10.1159/000078753. Epub 2004 Jun 1.